Evidence (7278 claims)
Search and filter individual claims pulled from the papers. Looking for a specific finding ("what's the effect on wages?"), you're in the right place. Want to compare whole outcome categories against each other instead? Use the Evidence Explorer.
The board below groups claims two ways: by broad theme (nine paper-level topics) and by outcome category (the 34 claim-level outcomes that the Explorer and Syntheses also use).
Browse by theme
Nine broad, paper-level topics. Click one to filter the claims below.
Adoption
9047 claims
Filter claims →
Productivity
8066 claims
Filter claims →
Governance
7278 claims
Filtered →
Human-AI Collaboration
6912 claims
Filter claims →
Org Design
4439 claims
Filter claims →
Innovation
4359 claims
Filter claims →
Labor Markets
3652 claims
Filter claims →
Skills & Training
3018 claims
Filter claims →
Inequality
2160 claims
Filter claims →
Claims by outcome category
Counts by direction of finding. These are the same 34 outcome categories the Explorer compares and the Syntheses are written for. A linked row has a published synthesis.
| Outcome | Positive | Negative | Mixed | Null | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 795 | 210 | 105 | 955 | 2131 |
| Governance & Regulation | 886 | 414 | 197 | 126 | 1654 |
| Organizational Efficiency | 826 | 204 | 129 | 87 | 1257 |
| Technology Adoption Rate | 681 | 259 | 128 | 110 | 1189 |
| Research Productivity | 464 | 138 | 65 | 349 | 1028 |
| Output Quality | 503 | 196 | 61 | 53 | 813 |
| Decision Quality | 351 | 180 | 84 | 51 | 673 |
| AI Safety & Ethics | 238 | 288 | 71 | 34 | 637 |
| Firm Productivity | 455 | 58 | 92 | 20 | 631 |
| Market Structure | 186 | 172 | 123 | 25 | 511 |
| Task Allocation | 222 | 70 | 76 | 34 | 407 |
| Innovation Output | 238 | 28 | 48 | 18 | 334 |
| Skill Acquisition | 177 | 62 | 62 | 17 | 318 |
| Employment Level | 107 | 57 | 108 | 13 | 287 |
| Fiscal & Macroeconomic | 135 | 72 | 44 | 26 | 284 |
| Firm Revenue | 172 | 50 | 28 | 5 | 256 |
| Consumer Welfare | 121 | 68 | 45 | 12 | 246 |
| Task Completion Time | 183 | 33 | 10 | 13 | 240 |
| Inequality Measures | 45 | 126 | 50 | 6 | 227 |
| Worker Satisfaction | 95 | 74 | 23 | 12 | 204 |
| Error Rate | 77 | 98 | 11 | 4 | 190 |
| Regulatory Compliance | 84 | 73 | 17 | 7 | 181 |
| Automation Exposure | 61 | 61 | 27 | 14 | 166 |
| Training Effectiveness | 98 | 21 | 14 | 19 | 154 |
| Wages & Compensation | 78 | 37 | 25 | 6 | 146 |
| Developer Productivity | 105 | 18 | 14 | 6 | 144 |
| Team Performance | 87 | 17 | 28 | 10 | 143 |
| Job Displacement | 12 | 83 | 23 | 1 | 119 |
| Hiring & Recruitment | 53 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 72 |
| Social Protection | 39 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 66 |
| Creative Output | 32 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 64 |
| Skill Obsolescence | 5 | 50 | 6 | 1 | 62 |
| Labor Share of Income | 17 | 20 | 17 | — | 54 |
| Worker Turnover | 15 | 15 | — | 3 | 33 |
| Industry | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
Governance
Remove filter
Evaluation approaches in the reviewed literature varied widely, with many studies using retrospective accuracy metrics (AUC, precision/recall) rather than causal impact measures on harm reduction.
Methods synthesis in review: prevalence of supervised/unsupervised ML with retrospective performance reporting; few RCTs or field experiments reported.
Four primary application areas were identified: (1) behavioural monitoring and feedback, (2) predictive risk modelling, (3) decision support and AI classifiers, and (4) limit‑setting and self‑exclusion tools.
Thematic synthesis of included studies categorizing described applications into four main areas (review taxonomy).
Searches were performed in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO and IEEE, plus manual searches, following PRISMA guidelines.
Methods section of the review specifying databases searched and PRISMA-guided review process.
The review included 68 empirical and methodological studies on deep technologies in online gambling.
Systematic review following PRISMA; searches of Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, IEEE and manual searching produced 68 included studies (count reported in paper).
The study uses a game-theoretic model involving a foundation model provider and two competing downstream firms to analyze how policy interventions affect consumer surplus in the AI supply chain.
Methodological description in the paper: a formal game-theoretic model with one upstream provider and two downstream competing firms; equilibrium analysis and comparative statics are performed on model outcomes (prices, qualities, profits, consumer surplus).
Foi realizada etnografia organizacional orientada ao SCF, com roteiro e triangulação de evidências.
Método qualitativo divulgado no resumo: etnografia organizacional com roteiro e triangulação; o resumo não fornece número de organizações, duração ou amostragem.
Foi construído e validado um instrumento psicométrico (escala SCF-30) e calculado um índice 0–100, com modelagem por Equações Estruturais (SEM) e testes de confiabilidade/validade.
Descrição metodológica explícita no resumo: construção e validação da escala SCF-30, uso de SEM e testes de confiabilidade e validade. O resumo não detalha estatísticas, amostra ou resultados numéricos.
O SCF é operacionalizado por três vetores centrais: Percepção de Complexidade (PC), Aversão ao Risco Institucional (AR) e Inércia Cultural (IC).
Estrutura conceitual e operacional apresentada no artigo; especificação explícita dos três vetores como componentes do construto SCF.
This research conducts a critical analysis of the ethical implications of artificial intelligence in terms of job displacement during the fifth industrial revolution.
Author-declared methodology: a literature-based critical analysis drawing on novel studies and the existing body of literature; no further methodological details (e.g., inclusion criteria, databases searched) provided in the excerpt.
This study analyzes comments and statements from party members in OECD countries from 2016 to 2025 through content analysis, examining media interviews, speeches, and debates.
Description of the study's data and method: content analysis of party member comments and statements drawn from media interviews, speeches, and debates across OECD countries over the 2016–2025 period (sample size and selection details not reported in the excerpt).
The study uses topic modeling on a corpus of over 4,600 academic papers to identify the dominant themes in the economics of AI literature.
Unsupervised topic modeling applied to a compiled corpus of >4,600 papers (authors' described methodology and sample size).
The paper explores risk frameworks, ethical constraints, and policy imperatives related to AI.
Descriptive claim about the paper's analytic content (thematic/policy analysis); no empirical details or measurement approach are given in the abstract.
This paper investigates societal applications of AI across domains such as healthcare, education, accessibility, environmental management, emergency response, and civic administration.
Descriptive statement of the paper's scope and methods (literature review / cross-domain analysis implied); the abstract lists the domains but does not specify empirical procedures or sample sizes.
Chatbot suggestions were artificially varied in aggregate accuracy across treatment conditions from low (53%) to high (100%).
Paper describes experimental manipulation of chatbot suggestion accuracy with aggregate accuracies ranging from 53% to 100%; manipulation method (how suggestions were generated or sampled) described in methods (not fully detailed in excerpt).
Caseworkers in the control condition (no chatbot suggestions) had a mean accuracy of 49%.
Reported experimental outcome: mean accuracy for control group = 49%; based on the randomized experiment using the 770-question benchmark.
We conducted a randomized experiment with caseworkers recruited from nonprofit outreach organizations in Los Angeles.
Paper describes a randomized experiment recruiting caseworkers from nonprofit outreach organizations in Los Angeles; sample size and recruitment details not given in the excerpt.
The benchmark questions have corresponding expert-verified answers.
Paper states benchmark questions have expert-verified answers; verification method and number/credentials of experts not specified in the excerpt.
We created a 770-question multiple-choice benchmark dataset of difficult, but realistic questions that a caseworker might receive.
Paper reports creation of a benchmark dataset containing 770 multiple-choice questions described as difficult and realistic; questions and dataset construction described in methods (no sample-of-questions or external validation details provided in the excerpt).
The study's conclusions draw on three complementary evidence bases: (a) task-level evidence on what generative AI can already do in practice; (b) occupational exposure and complementarity analysis using Philippine labor force data; and (c) firm- and worker-level evidence on AI adoption.
Description of methods and data sources in the paper: task-level capability testing/assessment, analysis of national labor force/occupation data for exposure/complementarity, and firm/worker surveys or qualitative adoption evidence.
There is a need for more longitudinal and cross-country studies to better understand the long-term value creation of ERM in MSMEs.
Authors' conclusion and identified research gaps based on the scope and limitations of the existing literature reviewed (i.e., predominance of cross-sectional or single-country studies).
The paper explains the main legal frameworks that currently regulate AI in India, as well as proposals for future legislation.
Author's legal and policy analysis / document review of existing statutes and proposed laws (qualitative review). No quantitative sample size; based on review of legal texts and policy proposals cited in the article.
A “macro approach” that (1) directly models equilibrium behavior of large employers, (2) combines macro data with empirical estimates of employers’ responses (from the micro approach) to estimate the model, and (3) uses the model to compute aggregate costs of monopsony and optimal policies, is the appropriate methodological response.
Methodological proposal set out by the paper; this is a description of the authors' recommended empirical/theoretical strategy rather than an empirical finding. The excerpt contains no implementation details, datasets, or estimation results.
The traditional theoretical and empirical “micro approach” to studying labor market power requires that firms are small and atomistic.
Conceptual/theoretical characterization of the micro approach stated by the paper; no empirical sample, dataset, or formal model provided in the excerpt.
The review focuses on AI applications within small‑scale business environments, with a special focus on women‑owned micro firms in Jaipur, India.
Scope and aim articulated in the paper; geographic and demographic focus explicitly stated by the authors.
The systematic review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
Methodological statement in the paper indicating adherence to PRISMA 2020 for the review process.
After screening and eligibility filtering, 55 open‑access journal articles were included for in‑depth analysis.
PRISMA‑guided screening and eligibility process reported in the review; final included sample explicitly stated as 55 open‑access journal articles.
A Scopus search identified 265 records using keywords related to women’s entrepreneurship and AI.
Systematic literature search reported in the paper following PRISMA 2020; search executed in Scopus with specified keywords; initial yield stated as 265 records.
This research examined three countries (China, the United States, and Germany) using panel vector autoregressive (panel VAR) and difference-in-differences (DID) methods to assess how technology and public policy interventions affect emissions reductions.
Study design reported in the paper: sample of three countries (China, US, Germany) and application of panel VAR and DID methods; specific time period and sample size not provided in the summary.
Social assistance (SA) is defined here as noncontributory social transfers (including cash, vouchers, or in-kind transfers to families or individuals, including the elderly), public works programs, fee waivers, and subsidies.
Explicit definitional statement in the introduction (authors' operational definition for the chapter).
This chapter focuses on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and uses a 'review of reviews' approach to summarize the policy discourse and evidence on social protection and gender in adulthood, concentrating on social assistance, social care, and social insurance.
Methodological and scope statement explicitly given in the introduction (author-declared approach and focus).
This study draws on a critical AI media literacy framework to analyze user-generated discussions in the two largest higher education subreddits on Reddit.com.
Author-reported study design: application of a critical AI media literacy theoretical framework to a qualitative dataset consisting of user-generated discussions from the two largest higher-education subreddits. (Sample size/number of posts/threads not specified in the provided excerpt.)
The study used a mixed-methods design incorporating surveys from 150 LEP immigrants, interviews with 50 employers, and interviews with 20 translation service providers in various linguistically diverse U.S. cities, with quantitative analysis performed in SPSS Version 28 and qualitative thematic coding in NVivo 14.
Reported study design and sample: survey n=150 LEP immigrants; employer interviews n=50; translation provider interviews n=20; analytic software specified as SPSS v28 (quantitative) and NVivo 14 (qualitative).
The essay reviews seven books from the past dozen years by social scientists examining the economic impact of artificial intelligence (AI).
Qualitative book-review performed by the author; sample size explicitly stated as seven books published within the last ~12 years; method = synthesis/assessment of those seven books.
This systematic review follows PRISMA guidelines to examine the evolution, advancements, and state-of-the-art AI applications for GS-BESS optimization.
Methodological statement in the paper indicating the use of PRISMA guidelines for the review process. The excerpt does not include the PRISMA flow diagram or the exact article selection numbers.
Definitions and scopes of Material Passports vary among authors.
Content analysis of the 46 included studies showing differing definitions and scope treatments for MPs reported by the authors.
Among the included studies, 65% focused primarily on Material Passports (MPs), while 35% addressed MPs within the broader context of a circular economy (CE).
Quantitative categorization of the 46 included studies reported in the paper (percentages attributed to focus areas).
A total of 54 peer-reviewed articles and book chapters were screened from the Scopus database, of which 46 were included for in-depth analysis in April 2025.
Reported screening and inclusion counts from the Scopus search (54 screened, 46 included); date of in-depth analysis given as April 2025.
This article presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA methodology.
Stated methodology in the paper: SLR using PRISMA; literature search performed in Scopus; review process and inclusion/exclusion described (screening and inclusion counts reported).
The study tracked participants in a three-wave panel totaling over 1,500 workers.
Abstract reporting a three-wave panel design and a sample size of over 1,500 workers.
Task content and valence were randomized in the experiment.
Methodological statement in the abstract that task assignments, including their content and valence, were randomized across participants.
The paper presents relevant tradeoffs and design choices across human-LLM archetypes, including decision control, social hierarchies, cognitive forcing strategies, and information requirements.
Qualitative analysis and discussion in the paper synthesizing insights from the literature review and empirical evaluation. Method: thematic synthesis and design analysis. Sample size: based on the review of 113 papers and the clinical-case evaluation (details in full text).
We describe 17 human-LLM archetypes derived from a scoping literature review and thematic analysis of 113 LLM-supported decision-making papers.
Scoping literature review and thematic analysis method; corpus size = 113 LLM-supported decision-making papers (as reported in the paper).
The paper introduces the concept of human-LLM archetypes, defined as re-occurring socio-technical interaction patterns that structure the roles of humans and LLMs in collaborative decision-making.
Conceptual contribution presented in the paper (definition and framing). Method: theoretical/conceptual description in the manuscript. Sample size: not applicable.
By integrating dynamic capabilities theory with a micro foundations perspective, the study proposes a conditional model that reframes the essential challenge from technology adoption to organizational adaptation.
Model/theory construction presented in the paper (conceptual integration). This is a methodological/theoretical claim about the paper's contribution; no empirical validation provided.
This study identifies three types of AI triggers that target routines, cognitive frameworks, and resource allocation.
Proposed taxonomy / typology presented in the paper (theoretical classification). The claim is descriptive of the paper's contribution rather than empirically validated.
The analysis is framed through the integrated lens of the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and Institutional Theory to provide a multi-faceted understanding of adoption dynamics.
Stated theoretical framing and analytical approach in the study (methodological claim).
The research synthesizes evidence from a wide array of sources, including recent academic literature by Nigerian scholars, NPA official performance reports, policy documents, and international trade facilitation reports (e.g., UNCTAD).
Explicit description of data sources in the study methodology; method: secondary data synthesis (no sample size applicable).
This study investigates the current state of adoption, the prevailing barriers, and the resultant performance outcomes of digital and AI-driven logistics within Nigeria’s maritime supply chain.
Stated study aim and scope; method: rigorous secondary data analysis drawing on multiple documentary sources (Nigerian academic literature, NPA reports, policy documents, UNCTAD).
This study uses a conceptual and analytical approach to examine the impact of AI and automation on work.
Stated methodology in the paper's abstract/introduction: methodological description that the study is conceptual and analytical; no empirical sample or quantitative data reported.
The study draws extensively on contemporary literature in sustainable supply chain management, healthcare procurement, and ESG governance.
Methodological claim about the paper's research approach: literature review/synthesis across the cited domains (bibliographic evidence within the paper).