Evidence (4892 claims)
Search and filter individual claims pulled from the papers. Looking for a specific finding ("what's the effect on wages?"), you're in the right place. Want to compare whole outcome categories against each other instead? Use the Evidence Explorer.
The board below groups claims two ways: by broad theme (nine paper-level topics) and by outcome category (the 34 claim-level outcomes that the Explorer and Syntheses also use).
Browse by theme
Nine broad, paper-level topics. Click one to filter the claims below.
Adoption
9875 claims
Filter claims →
Productivity
8807 claims
Filter claims →
Governance
7870 claims
Filter claims →
Human-AI Collaboration
7560 claims
Filter claims →
Org Design
4892 claims
Filtered →
Innovation
4781 claims
Filter claims →
Labor Markets
4004 claims
Filter claims →
Skills & Training
3308 claims
Filter claims →
Inequality
2332 claims
Filter claims →
Claims by outcome category
Counts by direction of finding. These are the same 34 outcome categories the Explorer compares and the Syntheses are written for. A linked row has a published synthesis.
| Outcome | Positive | Negative | Mixed | Null | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 870 | 233 | 116 | 1066 | 2363 |
| Governance & Regulation | 976 | 451 | 218 | 133 | 1809 |
| Organizational Efficiency | 949 | 224 | 144 | 88 | 1416 |
| Technology Adoption Rate | 764 | 287 | 141 | 122 | 1325 |
| Research Productivity | 501 | 152 | 74 | 362 | 1101 |
| Output Quality | 542 | 216 | 69 | 69 | 896 |
| Decision Quality | 387 | 198 | 94 | 54 | 740 |
| Firm Productivity | 513 | 67 | 101 | 27 | 714 |
| AI Safety & Ethics | 249 | 303 | 73 | 36 | 667 |
| Market Structure | 190 | 192 | 134 | 27 | 548 |
| Task Allocation | 243 | 77 | 91 | 36 | 452 |
| Innovation Output | 291 | 33 | 55 | 20 | 401 |
| Skill Acquisition | 206 | 72 | 65 | 21 | 364 |
| Employment Level | 133 | 63 | 115 | 22 | 335 |
| Fiscal & Macroeconomic | 153 | 79 | 52 | 32 | 323 |
| Task Completion Time | 206 | 37 | 12 | 15 | 272 |
| Firm Revenue | 179 | 52 | 29 | 5 | 266 |
| Consumer Welfare | 130 | 76 | 47 | 13 | 266 |
| Inequality Measures | 48 | 137 | 51 | 6 | 242 |
| Worker Satisfaction | 101 | 81 | 25 | 13 | 220 |
| Error Rate | 84 | 110 | 11 | 5 | 210 |
| Wages & Compensation | 98 | 47 | 30 | 10 | 185 |
| Regulatory Compliance | 88 | 73 | 17 | 7 | 185 |
| Automation Exposure | 66 | 64 | 33 | 16 | 182 |
| Team Performance | 105 | 29 | 30 | 11 | 176 |
| Training Effectiveness | 109 | 22 | 14 | 21 | 168 |
| Developer Productivity | 114 | 21 | 14 | 8 | 158 |
| Job Displacement | 12 | 90 | 24 | 1 | 127 |
| Hiring & Recruitment | 57 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 80 |
| Skill Obsolescence | 6 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 72 |
| Social Protection | 43 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 70 |
| Creative Output | 35 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 70 |
| Labor Share of Income | 18 | 21 | 17 | 1 | 57 |
| Worker Turnover | 15 | 16 | — | 4 | 35 |
| Industry | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
Org Design
Remove filter
Algorithmic accuracy alone does not determine value; legitimacy and uptake hinge on people's and process readiness.
Thematic conclusion drawn from interviews, Likert surveys, and document analysis across cases indicating non-technical factors strongly influence uptake despite algorithmic performance metrics. (Sample size not reported.)
The long-term dynamic effects of AI on resilience remain unverified and require longer-term data.
Authors explicitly state the need for longer time-series data to validate long-term dynamics.
Enterprise-level indicators used in the study do not directly capture supply chain network structure and node dependencies.
Explicit limitation noted by the authors about measurement and scope.
The study's sample is limited to listed manufacturing companies, so conclusions should be applied cautiously to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Explicit limitation stated by the authors in the paper.
Mediation and moderation models are leveraged to explore how AI enhances resilience via resource allocation optimization, productivity, and technological innovation, and how conditional factors (e.g., agility) affect these links.
Authors state they used mediation and moderation models on firm-level data to test mechanisms and conditional effects.
The study uses data on A-share listed manufacturing companies from 2011 to 2023 and applies a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model to assess AI's impact on SCR.
Methods description provided in the paper summary: sample timeframe and econometric approach explicitly stated.
We contribute junior–senior accounts on their usage of agentic AI through a three-phase mixed-methods study: ACTA combined with a Delphi process with 5 seniors, an AI-assisted debugging task with 10 juniors, and blind reviews of junior prompt histories by 5 more seniors.
Authors' methodological description of the study design and participant counts as reported in the paper.
Technology-driven recruitment encompasses Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), AI-powered screening, video-based interviews, gamified assessments, and data analytics.
Conceptual description in the paper's introduction/background defining the scope of 'technology-driven recruitment'.
The study employed a mixed-methods research design combining a quantitative survey of 150 HR professionals and recruiters across manufacturing, IT, banking, and education sectors with qualitative case study analysis of four organizations in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.
Explicit methodological statement in the paper: quantitative survey (N=150) across specified sectors + qualitative case studies of 4 organizations in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.
The study used a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis of multiple case studies involving AI applications such as computer vision, robotics, and predictive analytics.
Authors report study design as mixed-method (qualitative + quantitative) applied to multiple case studies examining AI applications (computer vision, robotics, predictive analytics). No numeric sample size reported in the summary.
Prior research often treats AI presence as binary, framing it either as a hidden tool or a visible teammate.
Literature-summary claim asserted by the authors (literature review / conceptual critique). No quantitative evidence reported in the abstract.
A total of 160 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for the review.
Direct numerical summary reported in the abstract (number of articles meeting inclusion criteria).
This study conducted a systematic review of articles published in Web of Science and Scopus up to December 2025, following established methodological guidelines.
Explicit statement in abstract describing the study method (systematic review), data sources (Web of Science and Scopus), and time cutoff (December 2025).
We surveyed 860 Microsoft developers to understand where they want AI support, and where they want it to stay out.
Primary empirical method reported in the paper (survey) with sample size explicitly stated as 860 Microsoft developers.
Developers spend roughly one-tenth of their workday writing code.
Statement reported in the paper (abstract). No sample-size or measurement method for this specific statistic provided in the abstract.
We examine 12 tasks across two practical settings: an AI consultancy providing solutions to business problems and an AI software team developing software products.
Description of experimental design and sample reported in the paper (method section): 12 tasks, two practical settings.
The two case firms demonstrated contrasting approaches to implementing AI in recruitment.
Findings and case descriptions comparing the two firms' AI recruitment strategies and levels of implementation (n = 2 firms; interviews with 22 participants).
The research contributes by shifting focus to under-researched non-Western workplace settings, particularly technologically advancing Middle Eastern economies like Qatar.
Paper's stated contribution and scope: focus on Qatari organisations and Middle Eastern context.
Four key themes emerged from the data: (1) process optimisation through AI integration, (2) subjectivity in AI-powered recruitment, (3) recruitment strategies in the age of AI, and (4) strategic investments in AI.
Findings: thematic analysis identified these four themes from interview data (n = 22) across the two case firms.
Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns and relationships within the interview data.
Methods: analysis section reporting use of thematic analysis framework.
Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with twenty-two participants across various organisational roles and hierarchical levels.
Methods: semi-structured interviews reported with total participants n = 22 across roles/levels.
The research investigated two prominent Qatari firms with contrasting AI recruitment implementation approaches.
Methods / case selection: two firms were selected and contrasted on their AI recruitment approaches (number of firms = 2).
The study employed an interpretivist philosophy and a case study design.
Methods section: explicitly states interpretivist philosophy and case study design.
Collaboration among content creators can be modeled as a multi-agent stochastic linear bandit problem with a transferable utility (TU) cooperative game formulation, where a coalition's value equals the negative sum of its members' cumulative regrets.
Methodological/modeling claim: the paper defines a multi-agent stochastic linear bandit and maps coalition value to negative sum of cumulative regrets as the TU game payoff function.
All participants had access to the same AI tool; the experiment varied only the structure surrounding its use (behavioral vs cognitive scaffolding vs unstructured).
Experimental design description in the paper: common AI tool provided to all participants; randomization/assignment varied only the scaffolding around AI use.
These results are observational and reflect a single-operator dataset without controlled comparison.
Author statement in the paper describing study limitations.
External environmental pressures did not show a significant role in the adoption process.
PLS-SEM results from the survey (n=110) reportedly found no significant effect of environmental/external pressures on AI adoption.
Data analysis involved Smart PLS-SEM, which facilitated reliability and validity assessment along with hypothesis evaluation.
Paper reports using SmartPLS for Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling to assess reliability, validity, and test hypotheses.
The investigation was guided by the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework combined with innovation characteristics from Diffusion of Innovation theory.
Paper states theoretical frameworks used to design variables and hypotheses: TOE plus DOI innovation characteristics.
A total of 110 valid responses were collected through an organized online survey using purposive sampling.
Reported sample description in the paper: online survey, purposive sampling, resulting in 110 valid responses.
Exploratory innovation does not show a significant direct association with long-term competitive performance.
PLS-SEM results from the survey of 104 Portuguese B2B managers reporting a non-significant direct path from exploratory innovation to performance.
We validate this principle through a controlled experiment on log format token economy across four conditions (human-readable, structured, compressed, and tool-assisted compressed).
Controlled experiment described in the paper comparing four log-format conditions (human-readable, structured, compressed, tool-assisted compressed); exact sample size not reported in the abstract.
For six decades, software engineering principles have been optimized for a single consumer: the human developer.
Historical/position claim asserted in the paper (conceptual/literature-based argument), no empirical sample or quantitative test reported.
Through a causal decomposition that automates one side of agent communication, we separate cooperation failures from competence failures, tracing their origins through agent reasoning analysis.
Method described in the paper: causal decomposition approach that automates one side of communication and analyzes agent reasoning to attribute failures (methodological claim; abstract mentions the approach but gives no sample size or quantitative metrics there).
Capability does not predict cooperation.
Comparative experimental results reported in the paper showing different models with different capability levels achieving substantially different collective cooperation outcomes (specifically comparing OpenAI o3 and o3-mini).
We build a multi-agent setup designed to study cooperative behavior in a frictionless environment, removing all strategic complexity from cooperation.
Methodological description in the paper: design and implementation of a multi-agent experimental setup intended to remove strategic complexity (no sample size or quantitative detail reported in the abstract).
A pre-registered experiment evaluates this thesis in a commons production economy -- where agents share a finite resource pool and collaboratively produce value -- at 50-1,000 agent scale.
Paper states that a pre-registered experiment is planned/described; the experiment context (commons production economy) and planned scale (50-1,000 agents) are specified in the excerpt. No experimental outcomes or effect estimates are reported here.
We instantiate SoP in AgentCity on an EVM-compatible layer-2 blockchain (L2) with a three-tier contract hierarchy (foundational, meta, and operational).
Reported implementation/instantiation described in the paper (system implementation claim). The paper states the platform (AgentCity) and technical details (EVM-compatible L2, three-tier contracts).
In this architecture, smart contracts are the law itself -- the actual legislative output that agents produce and that governs their behavior.
Architectural/design claim in the paper describing conceptual role of smart contracts within SoP; presented as an intended property of the system.
Agents discover, transact with, and delegate to agents owned by other parties without centralized oversight.
Asserted behavior pattern of autonomous agents in the paper's motivation; presented as descriptive claim rather than supported by a reported experiment or dataset in the excerpt.
Autonomous AI agents are beginning to operate across organizational boundaries on the open internet.
Stated as an empirical observation in the paper's introduction/introduction-level motivation; no specific dataset or sample described in the text excerpt.
The divergence in collective outputs is not driven by participants abandoning AI, but by how participants use it.
Behavioral/usage data from the RCT indicating continued AI use across incentive conditions and differing usage patterns (no sample size or quantitative metrics provided in excerpt).
We conducted a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 627 articles.
Statement in abstract reporting a systematic review and bibliometric analysis; sample size explicitly given as 627 articles.
The governance calibration problem — balancing control with the autonomy that gives agentic AI its value — emerges as the STS joint optimization challenge: governance must simultaneously enable and constrain autonomous operation.
Authors' synthesis and theoretical claim based on STS analysis and identified tensions between autonomy benefits and control needs in the literature.
Agentic AI transformation barriers constitute an interdependent sociotechnical system rather than isolated obstacles.
Interpretive conclusion drawn from STS mapping and cross-barrier interaction analysis across the reviewed literature.
Governance serves as the social subsystem's primary mechanism for managing the technical subsystem.
Interpretation from STS analysis in the review: authors identify governance as the key social mechanism constraining/enabling technical subsystem behavior.
STS mapping based on root-cause analysis revealed that 12 barriers originate in the technical subsystem and 17 in the social subsystem.
Authors' STS mapping of the 29 barriers to subsystem origins (technical vs. social) as derived from their root-cause analysis of the coded literature.
Twenty-nine barriers were identified and classified into five dimensions: technological (7), organizational (7), human (6), governance and regulatory (4), and economic (5).
Results of inductive coding of the 30-source literature corpus yielding 29 distinct barriers and reported counts per dimension.
Sociotechnical Systems (STS) theory was applied as an interpretive lens to map dimensions onto social and technical subsystems and analyze cross-subsystem interactions.
Self-reported analytic approach: application of STS theory to the coded barriers to map origins and interactions across subsystems.
Barriers were identified inductively through open and axial coding.
Self-reported qualitative method: inductive thematic analysis using open and axial coding on the literature corpus.