Evidence (4137 claims)
Adoption
5267 claims
Productivity
4560 claims
Governance
4137 claims
Human-AI Collaboration
3103 claims
Labor Markets
2506 claims
Innovation
2354 claims
Org Design
2340 claims
Skills & Training
1945 claims
Inequality
1322 claims
Evidence Matrix
Claim counts by outcome category and direction of finding.
| Outcome | Positive | Negative | Mixed | Null | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 378 | 106 | 59 | 455 | 1007 |
| Governance & Regulation | 379 | 176 | 116 | 58 | 739 |
| Research Productivity | 240 | 96 | 34 | 294 | 668 |
| Organizational Efficiency | 370 | 82 | 63 | 35 | 553 |
| Technology Adoption Rate | 296 | 118 | 66 | 29 | 513 |
| Firm Productivity | 277 | 34 | 68 | 10 | 394 |
| AI Safety & Ethics | 117 | 177 | 44 | 24 | 364 |
| Output Quality | 244 | 61 | 23 | 26 | 354 |
| Market Structure | 107 | 123 | 85 | 14 | 334 |
| Decision Quality | 168 | 74 | 37 | 19 | 301 |
| Fiscal & Macroeconomic | 75 | 52 | 32 | 21 | 187 |
| Employment Level | 70 | 32 | 74 | 8 | 186 |
| Skill Acquisition | 89 | 32 | 39 | 9 | 169 |
| Firm Revenue | 96 | 34 | 22 | — | 152 |
| Innovation Output | 106 | 12 | 21 | 11 | 151 |
| Consumer Welfare | 70 | 30 | 37 | 7 | 144 |
| Regulatory Compliance | 52 | 61 | 13 | 3 | 129 |
| Inequality Measures | 24 | 68 | 31 | 4 | 127 |
| Task Allocation | 75 | 11 | 29 | 6 | 121 |
| Training Effectiveness | 55 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 96 |
| Error Rate | 42 | 48 | 6 | — | 96 |
| Worker Satisfaction | 45 | 32 | 11 | 6 | 94 |
| Task Completion Time | 78 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 89 |
| Wages & Compensation | 46 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 83 |
| Team Performance | 44 | 9 | 15 | 7 | 76 |
| Hiring & Recruitment | 39 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 52 |
| Automation Exposure | 18 | 17 | 9 | 5 | 50 |
| Job Displacement | 5 | 31 | 12 | — | 48 |
| Social Protection | 21 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 39 |
| Developer Productivity | 29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 36 |
| Worker Turnover | 10 | 12 | — | 3 | 25 |
| Skill Obsolescence | 3 | 19 | 2 | — | 24 |
| Creative Output | 15 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 24 |
| Labor Share of Income | 10 | 4 | 9 | — | 23 |
Governance
Remove filter
Econometric approach relies on cross-country panel regressions and interaction terms to assess direct effects and complementarities; identification is associative (panel variation + controls) rather than claiming causal identification using instruments or natural experiments.
Paper describes use of panel regressions with interaction terms and emphasizes that identification comes from panel variation and covariate controls, without detailing stronger causal identification strategies.
Models control for key macroeconomic covariates (e.g., GDP per capita, trade openness, human capital, institutional quality) to isolate technology effects.
Paper documents inclusion of macro controls in regression models to reduce omitted-variable bias.
Dependent variable is a composite national Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) performance index (aggregate/summary measure).
Paper specifies the dependent variable as an aggregate SDG performance measure used in the panel regressions.
Unit of analysis is country-year observations for G20 members covering 2015–2023.
Paper states sample and scope as a cross-country panel of G20 economies from 2015–2023 (panel dataset). (Up to 20 countries × 9 years = up to 180 country-year observations, depending on coverage).
The paper's empirical approach is primarily qualitative and interpretive: a systematic literature review plus comparative qualitative case studies, using policy documents, public diplomacy examples, development initiatives, technology export and standards behaviour, and secondary empirical studies as evidence.
Methods section of the paper explicitly states the approach and evidence types; sample of four comparative cases (US, China, EU, Russia) is specified.
The paper demonstrates different mixes and institutional practices of smart power in practice by applying the framework to the United States, China, the European Union, and Russia.
Explicit comparative qualitative case studies of four major international actors (sample size: four cases) using policy documents, public diplomacy examples, and development/technology initiatives as illustrative evidence.
Empirical validation of the book’s proposals would require complementary case studies, model documentation, and outcome measurements.
Author/reviewer recommendation in the blurb about methodological limitations and next steps; not an empirical finding.
The book is predominantly conceptual and policy-analytic and uses illustrative case vignettes rather than presenting a single empirical study.
Explicit methodological description in the Data & Methods blurb: synthesis of technical ideas, governance requirements, and illustrative vignettes; no empirical sample or experimental protocol described.
The research program is grounded in 12 years of forensic legal research spanning 2014–2026.
Author-stated research timeline and methodology (2014–2026 forensic legal research).
The protocol is underpinned by a forensic audit of approximately 4,200 specialized texts (legal doctrine, regulation, standards, technical literature).
Stated corpus and audit in the Methods section: ~4,200 texts reviewed as part of the forensic audit.
The protocol systematizes arguments for 16 projected rulings at Mexico’s Supreme Court (SCJN) to anchor the proposed rights and rules in constitutional practice.
Doctrinal projection and constitutional strategy section of the compendium describing 16 projected SCJN rulings (method: legal projection/modeling).
The compendium’s findings and recommendations are based on a forensic audit of approximately 4,200 specialized texts covering doctrine, jurisprudence, regulation and technical literature.
Stated methodological claim in the compendium: forensic corpus audit of ~4,200 texts (sample size reported).
The evidence base is qualitative: the study uses conceptual framework synthesis, comparative analysis of multi-sector implementations, and case examples rather than randomized or large-sample empirical evaluation.
Methods and limitations section of the paper explicitly describing the evidence base and methods (qualitative synthesis, pattern extraction, cross-case lessons).
The paper presents a deployment pattern intended to be adapted by sector and regulatory context rather than a one-size-fits-all blueprint.
Explicit statement in the paper and the described pattern design; based on qualitative pattern extraction and prescriptive guidance.
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test hypothesized direct, mediated, and moderated paths.
Methods/analysis section states PLS-SEM was the statistical approach to estimate paths, mediation, and moderation effects.
The study employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects experimental design manipulating (1) identity disclosure (transparent vs. nondisclosed) and (2) conversational tone (empathetic/personalized vs. generic).
Explicit description of experimental factors and design in the methods (2 × 2 between-subjects).
Stimuli (chatbot dialogues) were standardized and pretested using a large-language-model (LLM) workflow to ensure consistent experimental stimuli across conditions.
Methods section describing stimuli creation: LLM-generated dialogues were produced and pretested to standardize messages across the 2 × 2 conditions.
Quasi-experimental designs (difference-in-differences, instrumental variables, event studies) and panel regressions are useful methods for identifying causal effects of AI adoption where plausibly exogenous variation exists.
Methodological summary in the paper listing common empirical strategies used in the literature to estimate causal impacts of technology adoption.
Current research is limited by measurement challenges in capturing AI capabilities and firm-level adoption, and by a lack of longitudinal worker-firm data and causal identification in many settings.
Explicit limitations noted by the paper: gaps in task measures, scarce longitudinal linked datasets, and methodological challenges in causal inference.
This paper's approach is qualitative and based on secondary literature synthesis; it does not collect primary survey, experimental, or administrative data.
Explicit statement in the Data & Methods section of the paper.
Key empirical gaps remain: better measurement of K_T (AI/software capital), more granular matched employer‑employee and wealth data, and improved estimates of task-substitution elasticities are required to precisely quantify incidence and policy impacts.
Authors’ stated research agenda and limitations section, including sensitivity analyses showing outcome variation with parameter choices and measurement uncertainty.
The study points to the need for longitudinal, experimental, or platform-log-based designs to establish causality and measure heterogeneity across platforms.
Authors' methodological recommendations and proposed empirical agenda built on limitations of their cross-sectional survey (N = 450) and literature gaps.
Policy and practice interventions (media literacy, platform design changes, mandated diversity, etc.) are recommended to increase informational diversity and mitigate polarization.
Policy recommendations derived from study findings and literature discussion; not evaluated experimentally in the paper (authors propose interventions as implications).
Algorithmic recommendation (structural) and user selective consumption (behavioural) jointly reinforce ideological positions in digital spaces.
Interpretation based on observed associations between selective exposure and polarization plus reported heterogeneity in perceived algorithmic influence from the N = 450 survey; authors frame results as indicating interacting structural and behavioural mechanisms.
Higher levels of selective exposure are positively associated with increased ideological polarization.
Correlational analyses (reported associations / regression-style tests) using survey measures of selective exposure and measures of opinion/political polarization in the same cross-sectional sample (N = 450).
A large majority of respondents reported frequent exposure to content aligned with their preexisting views (widespread echo chambers / filter bubbles).
Quantitative cross-sectional survey of N = 450 active social media users; self-reported measures of content consumption and indicators of selective exposure; descriptive statistics showing most respondents frequently encounter ideologically consonant content.
Hukum diharapkan tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai alat perlindungan, tetapi juga sebagai instrumen strategis dalam mengelola transisi menuju masa depan kerja yang lebih inklusif, adil, dan berkelanjutan di era kecerdasan buatan.
Kesimpulan dan rekomendasi normatif penulis berdasarkan analisis perundang-undangan dan literatur yang dikaji.
Pengakuan 'hak atas pengembangan keterampilan berkelanjutan' (right to lifelong learning) penting dan perlu dimasukkan sebagai bagian integral dari perlindungan pekerja di era digital.
Klaim normatif dan rekomendasi kebijakan yang muncul dari studi konseptual dan tinjauan literatur komparatif.
Diperlukan reformasi hukum yang lebih progresif dan adaptif, termasuk penguatan sistem jaminan sosial dan pembaruan kebijakan fiskal untuk menangani dampak AI.
Rekomendasi kebijakan yang disimpulkan dari analisis normatif dan komparatif serta tinjauan literatur dalam penelitian.
Diperlukan dasar hukum bagi penerapan model kompensasi inovatif seperti Universal Basic Income (UBI), pajak otomasi, dan skema distribusi manfaat produktivitas AI.
Rekomendasi kebijakan hasil analisis normatif dan komparatif yang dikemukakan penulis berdasarkan tinjauan literatur.
The case for mutually beneficial industrial policy is stronger for product innovation than for process innovation, because product innovation directly affects demand and triggers stronger network effects while process innovation operates indirectly through supply.
Model variants distinguishing product vs. process R&D within the two-country framework; comparative analysis showing larger demand-driven network effects for product innovation (theoretical model results; no empirical sample).
Under sufficiently strong network externalities and weak substitutability (or weak complementarity) of the goods, industrial policy competition can make both countries simultaneously better off compared to the laissez-faire outcome because of a mutual business-enhancement effect.
Theoretical demonstration within the two-country model: parameter regions (strength of externality, degree of product differentiation) where simultaneous welfare improvements occur relative to laissez-faire (analytical/model results; no empirical sample).
Social security solutions must be adapted to evolving human-technology interactions to secure social justice and cohesion.
Normative conclusion/recommendation from the paper's discussion; advanced as a necessary policy direction without reported empirical validation in the provided text.
Establishing contributory frameworks based on technology-generated income will ensure the sustainability of social protection in the era of labor displacement.
Presented as a novel policy proposal in the paper; stated as a solution with the asserted effect of ensuring sustainability rather than demonstrated via empirical testing or simulation within the text provided.
The Internet of Things (IoT) represents a transformative force, integrating digital intelligence with the physical world and catalyzing new relationships across economic sectors.
Stated as a conceptual assertion in the paper's introduction/overview; presented as a high-level literature-informed claim (no empirical sample or quantitative analysis reported).
Frontier models (Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5-chat, GPT-5-mini) achieve statistically indistinguishable semantic closeness scores above 4.6 out of 5.0.
Reported semantic closeness scores from the LLM-as-Judge evaluation on the 15-proposal dataset; the paper states frontier models scored above 4.6/5.0 and were statistically indistinguishable from each other.
Autor et al. (2024) show that the majority of current employment is in job specialties that did not exist in 1940, with new task creation driven by augmentation-type innovations.
Citation reported in the paper summarizing Autor et al. (2024); no sample size provided in excerpt.
Firms may not sufficiently account for non-monetary aspects of technological progress (well-being, safety, quality of work); a planner would include such considerations in steering technological progress.
Normative conclusion based on theoretical analysis comparing firm objective functions (profits) vs social planner objectives (including non-monetary utility).
The planner can raise social welfare by focusing technological progress on making goods cheaper that are disproportionately consumed by relatively poorer agents, thereby raising their real income.
Extension of the baseline model to multiple goods showing distributional gains via composition of price changes (real income channel).
When capital and labor are gross complements, a planner concerned with workers' welfare would favor capital-augmenting innovations to raise wages.
Analytical result from the model analyzing factor-augmenting technological progress and complementarity between capital and labor.
A planner with sufficient welfare weight on workers will impose positive robot taxes, with the tax rate increasing in the planner's concern for workers' welfare.
Application of the baseline model to robot taxation; analytical derivation of optimal robot tax under planner preferences.
As labor's economic value diminishes, steering progress focuses increasingly on enhancing human well-being (non-monetary aspects) rather than labor productivity.
Theoretical discussion and model results in the paper showing planner's shifting objective when labor is devalued.
The welfare benefits of steering technology are greater the less efficient social safety nets are.
Analytical result from the paper's theoretical model comparing a planner who can/cannot perform transfers and evaluating steering as second-best when redistribution is costly.
IMDPs lower ESG rating uncertainty.
The paper constructs measures of ESG rating uncertainty and finds IMDP participation reduces rating uncertainty.
IMDPs reduce greenwashing.
The paper constructs measures of greenwashing and reports that IMDP participation lowers those greenwashing measures.
The positive effect of IMDP participation on ESG performance is stronger in capital-scarce industries.
Heterogeneity analysis by industry capital-scarcity reported in the paper indicating larger IMDP effects in capital-scarce industries.
The positive effect of IMDP participation on ESG performance is stronger for firms at the growth stage.
Heterogeneity analysis by firm life-cycle stage reported in the paper showing larger effects for growth-stage firms.
The positive effect of IMDP participation on ESG performance is stronger for firms under intense competitive pressure.
Heterogeneity analysis reported in the paper that splits the sample by measures of competitive pressure and finds larger effects for firms facing more intense competition.
The effect of IMDP participation on ESG performance operates through improved cost management, consistent with capability upgrading and resource reallocation toward sustainability-related activities.
Mechanism analyses reported in the paper linking IMDP participation to measures of cost management and interpreting this as capability upgrading/resource reallocation.
The effect of IMDP participation on ESG performance operates through higher innovation efficiency.
Mechanism analyses reported in the paper (mediation/decomposition analyses linking IMDP participation to measures of innovation efficiency).