Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
4Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2025–2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
3294084
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- A. Tsyvinski (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Labor Markets: 2 papers
- Productivity: 2 papers
- Innovation: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 2 papers
- Firm Productivity: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Automation Exposure: 1 paper
- Innovation Output: 1 paper
- Wages: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firms most tied to real-world AI usage command a substantial market premium: a factor based on token, dollar and user growth predicts a cross-sectional AI premium worth about 64 basis points per week for a value-weighted long–short strategy, concentrated in intensive closed-source and paid AI use and in nonroutine interactive occupations, but missing in emerging markets.arxiv | A. Tsyvinski provider id |
2026-06-29 | 1 |
| Technological change cleanly splits into an 'earnings' gradient and a 'reallocation' divergence, allowing precise mapping from tech shocks to wages and worker sorting; calibrated to U.S. data, cognitive skill–biased technological change meaningfully reshapes occupational sorting and earnings patterns.arxiv | A. Tsyvinski provider id |
2025-12-11 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 2 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.