Firms most tied to real-world AI usage command a substantial market premium: a factor based on token, dollar and user growth predicts a cross-sectional AI premium worth about 64 basis points per week for a value-weighted long–short strategy, concentrated in intensive closed-source and paid AI use and in nonroutine interactive occupations, but missing in emerging markets.
AI Premium
Firms whose stock returns covary more strongly with a high-frequency AI consumption factor earn a large, heterogeneous AI premium—especially when exposure is to intensive, closed-source, paid, seasoned-user usage and long prompts—and this premium maps to occupations high in nonroutine interactive work but is absent in emerging markets.
Using 380 trillion tokens of realized AI consumption across more than four hundred large language models from the licensed proprietary OpenRouter dataset covering approximately 2 percent of current global monthly AI token consumption, we analyze how AI affects firms, markets, and workers. Leveraging the unprecedented size, scope and granularity data, we construct the AI Factor from growth in tokens, dollars, and users, estimate firm-level AI Betas from stock return comovement, and characterize the AI Premium. First, we build a high-frequency AI factor and decompose it into salient components. Second, we show that firms whose returns covary more positively with the AI factor--high AI beta firms--earn higher subsequent returns, and the AI premium is large and heterogeneous. A value-weighted long-short strategy earns 64.1 basis points per week, and the premium is large for loadings on the intensive, frontier-oriented margin of AI consumption-closed-source models, paying and seasoned users, and long prompts--but not on casual or open-weight use. Third, the premium reaches beyond technology firms into consumer-facing and capital-heavy parts of the economy, but is absent in emerging markets, including China. Fourth, the AI exposure is more positive in nonroutine interactive work and the more negative in analytical, scientific, and operations-control skills--an occupation one standard deviation higher in interaction-and-communication content has 0.36-standard-deviation higher market-implied AI premium. Additionally, we provide early evidence of the rise of the agentic economy.
Summary
Main Finding
Equity markets price realized AI consumption: firms whose stock returns co-move more with a high-frequency AI Factor (constructed from actual token, dollar, and user growth in OpenRouter data) earn a large, positive AI premium. The premium is concentrated on the intensive/frontier margin of AI use (closed‑source models, paid/seasoned users, long prompts), maps to nonroutine interactive occupations and skills, and shows early signs of an “agentic” premium as multi-step agentic requests surge.
Key Points
- Data scale and scope: licensed OpenRouter panel (user–model–day) Jan 2024–Apr 2026 covering ~380 trillion tokens (the authors’ sample ≈ 2% of projected global monthly token run-rate) across 400+ LLMs and millions of anonymized accounts.
- AI Factor: first principal component of weekly log-growth in total tokens, dollars spent, and distinct active users (weights ≈ 0.665, 0.559, 0.496) explaining 56.5% of joint variance.
- AI Betas: firm-level exposures estimated from co-movement of stock returns with the AI Factor.
- AI Premium (main asset-pricing result):
- Value-weighted high-minus-low AI-beta quintile spread = 64.1 basis points per week (t = 2.84).
- Spread ~56 bps/week after Fama–French five-factor + momentum adjustment (t = 2.41).
- Positive price of AI risk in Fama–MacBeth regressions controlling for size, value, profitability, investment, momentum, reversal, leverage, accruals.
- Heterogeneity and intensive-margin concentration:
- Larger premium for exposure measured from frontier closed‑source models (53.4 bps/week) vs open-weight models (32.3 bps/week).
- Larger for paid/core users (66.8 bps) and seasoned users (59.3 bps) than for new/non-seasoned users.
- Larger for long prompts (54.1 bps) than short prompts (33.0 bps).
- Robustness: premium survives controls for high-tech factor, semiconductor portfolio, AI/robotics ETF basket, industry demeaning (FF30), and Google Trends attention to AI.
- Geography and industries:
- Developed markets: high-minus-low spread ≈ 17.9 bps/week (t=2.77).
- Emerging markets (including China): negligible/insignificant spread ≈ 5.0 bps/week.
- Industry: most positive exposures in retail and consumer durables; most negative in health and non-durable goods.
- Occupations & skills (market-implied mapping):
- Mapped firm exposures → occupations (BLS weights) → skills (O*NET).
- Nonroutine interactive tasks (communication, persuasion, instruction, installation & repair, systems-integration) show positive AI exposure.
- Analytical/scientific and operations-control tasks show negative AI exposure.
- Effect magnitudes: 1 SD higher nonroutine interactive content → +0.15 SD AI exposure (t=2.87); 1 SD higher nonroutine analytic content → −0.15 SD (t=−3.41).
- Interaction & communication skill: +0.36 SD AI exposure per 1 SD (t=4.21). Information use: −0.29 (t=−2.43).
- Existing occupation-level AI exposure measures explain <2% of observed variation in market-implied exposures.
- Agentic AI:
- Agentic token share rose from near zero in 2024 to ≈ 50% of tokens by end of sample; agentic dollar share rose more slowly (unit costs fell).
- Token-level components (tool calls, internal reasoning tokens, cache reads): tool-call and cache-read shares rose to ~40–50% of tokens.
- Cross-sectional exposure to agentic components yields positive point estimates (~0.3–0.5% per week) but estimates are imprecise in the short sample — interpreted as early evidence of an agentic premium.
- Event studies: around frontier model releases, high-AI-beta firms outperform low-AI-beta firms by ≈1.9% over a 5-day window (1.1% after five-factor + momentum adjustment).
- Caveats:
- Sample covers an early, fast-moving phase — results reflect current market pricing, not necessarily long-run equilibrium.
- OpenRouter may overrepresent sophisticated/developer user activity; results tied to realized observed consumption in this dataset.
Data & Methods
- Data:
- Licensed OpenRouter user–model–day panel (Jan 2024–Apr 2026), millions of anonymized accounts, >400 model versions (frontier closed‑source and open‑weight models).
- Constructed weekly series: total tokens, dollars spent, distinct active users. Subsamples used to create sub-factors: closed vs open models, paid/core vs new accounts, seasoned vs non-seasoned users, long vs short prompts, content categories, agentic vs non-agentic.
- AI Factor construction:
- First principal component of standardized weekly log-growth rates of the three series; uses growth (changes) not levels to capture unexpected adoption/intensity shocks.
- Firm-level exposure estimation:
- Time-series regressions of excess firm returns on the AI Factor to estimate AI betas (exposures).
- Cross-sectional asset-pricing tests: portfolio sorts (value-weighted quintiles), Fama–MacBeth regressions, adjustments for FF5, momentum, and a battery of firm characteristics.
- Robustness: include controls for technology factors, sector demeaning, alternative attention measures.
- Occupation/skill mapping:
- Map firm/industry exposures → occupations via BLS employment shares → map occupations → skills using O*NET ratings; regressions relate task/skill measures to market-implied AI exposure.
- Agentic analysis:
- Identify requests that invoke external tools as agentic; decompose tokens into tool calls, reasoning, cache reads; track time series and cross-sectional exposures.
Implications for AI Economics
- Market pricing and transition risk:
- Markets currently treat exposure to realized AI consumption as a priced risk factor; AI creates reallocation risk that investors demand compensation for—consistent with transition-risk and task-reallocation theories.
- Intensive/frontier adoption matters:
- Value is concentrated on frontier, paid, and experienced use and in complex prompts → policies, firm strategy, and diffusion models should distinguish intensive frontier adoption from casual/open use.
- Geography and inequality:
- The premium is concentrated in developed markets and absent in emerging markets (including China) in this sample, implying regional divergence in who captures AI gains—relevant for trade, investment, and industrial policy.
- Labor reallocation and skill demand:
- Market-implied evidence suggests gains to nonroutine interactive occupations and skills (communication, persuasion, installation/repair, systems integration) and relative pressure on analytic, scientific, and operations-control roles.
- These findings imply differential demand shifts across occupations and the importance of retraining/reskilling policies emphasizing interactive and integrative skills.
- Rise of agentic AI:
- Rapid growth in agentic consumption (multi-step, tool-using agents) and tentative agentic premium point to a structural shift in what firms purchase from AI — demands new measurement, pricing, and regulatory attention (tool access, coordination externalities, liability).
- Measurement contribution:
- Using realized, cross‑provider token-level consumption to construct an AI Factor provides an alternative, market-oriented measurement approach to usage- or capability-based indices; useful for future empirical work linking adoption to prices, investment, and labor outcomes.
- Research and policy cautions:
- Results reflect an early, possibly transient phase dominated by sophisticated users; long-run effects will depend on broader diffusion, cost declines, competitive responses, and regulation.
- For policy and firm strategy, focus on differential effects across industries, occupations, and regions rather than treating “AI” as a homogeneous shock.
Summary judgment: This paper delivers robust, large-scale evidence that markets price exposure to realized AI consumption today, with the premium concentrated at the frontier and mapped to specific tasks and skills—offering a valuable market-based lens for analyzing AI-driven reallocation of value across firms and labor.
Assessment
Paper Typecorrelational
Evidence Strengthmedium — The paper uses an unusually large and granular proprietary dataset and standard asset-pricing techniques to show robust predictive relationships and economically large strategy returns, with plausible heterogeneity tests that align with mechanisms (closed-source, paid users, prompt length, occupation exposures). However, identification remains correlational without exogenous variation or quasi-experiments, leaving open alternative explanations (omitted factors, hype/risk premia, measurement bias) and limiting causal claims.
Methods Rigormedium — Methodologically the paper applies established factor-construction and beta-estimation procedures and presents multiple heterogeneity checks (model type, geography, occupations), which indicates careful empirical work; but potential concerns remain about sample selection from a proprietary 2% coverage dataset, the mapping from token-use to firm-level exposure, possible omitted-variable confounding in returns regressions, and limited discussion (in the summary) of robustness to common asset-pricing controls and reverse causality tests.
SampleProprietary OpenRouter usage data: ~380 trillion tokens across >400 large language models covering roughly 2% of current global monthly token consumption, broken down by model (closed vs open-weight), payment status, user seasoning, and prompt length; matched to public firm stock returns (global, with results reported separately for developed vs emerging markets) and to occupation-level skill measures to map AI exposure across jobs.
Themesinnovation productivity labor_markets
IdentificationObservational factor approach: construct a high-frequency AI consumption factor from token, dollar, and user growth (from OpenRouter usage data) and estimate firm-level AI betas via time-series comovement of stock returns with that AI factor; document pricing anomalies using portfolio sorts and long–short strategies and probe mechanisms via heterogeneity (model type, paid/seasoned users, prompt length) and occupation-level exposure mapping.
GeneralizabilityOpenRouter covers only ~2% of global monthly token consumption and may be non-representative across providers, industries, or geographies, Proprietary dataset likely biased toward certain platforms, languages, or user types (Western/English-speaking heavy), Mapping token consumption to firm-level economic activity may misattribute AI use (noise in assignment or omitted firm-level measures), Findings appear absent in emerging markets (including China), limiting external validity globally, Short, high-frequency sample may capture hype or early-adopter dynamics rather than long-run structural productivity effects, Results may reflect market perceptions or risk premia rather than realized productivity gains
Claims (11)
| Claim | Direction | Outcome | Confidence & Evidence | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The analysis uses 380 trillion tokens of realized AI consumption across more than four hundred large language models from the licensed proprietary OpenRouter dataset covering approximately 2 percent of current global monthly AI token consumption. Other | null_result | scale and coverage of AI consumption data (tokens, model count, % global consumption) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
high
|
380 trillion tokens; more than four hundred models; approximately 2 percent coverage
|
| We construct a high-frequency AI Factor from growth in tokens, dollars, and users, estimate firm-level AI Betas from stock return comovement, and characterize the AI Premium. Other | null_result | AI Factor, firm-level AI Betas, characterization of AI Premium |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
high
|
not reported
|
| Firms whose returns covary more positively with the AI factor (high AI beta firms) earn higher subsequent returns; the AI premium is large and heterogeneous. Firm Productivity | positive | subsequent stock returns (AI premium) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| A value-weighted long-short strategy (long high-AI-beta firms, short low-AI-beta firms) earns 64.1 basis points per week. Firm Productivity | positive | strategy weekly return |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
64.1 basis points per week
|
| The AI premium is large for loadings on the intensive, frontier-oriented margin of AI consumption—closed-source models, paying and seasoned users, and long prompts. Firm Productivity | positive | AI premium associated with specific AI consumption margins (closed-source models, paying/seasoned users, long prompts) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The AI premium is not present for loadings on casual use or open-weight (open-source) model use. Firm Productivity | null_result | AI premium related to casual or open-weight model use |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The AI premium reaches beyond technology firms into consumer-facing and capital-heavy parts of the economy. Firm Productivity | positive | presence and magnitude of AI premium across industry sectors (consumer-facing, capital-heavy) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The AI premium is absent in emerging markets, including China. Firm Productivity | negative | AI premium presence/absence in emerging markets (e.g., China) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| AI exposure is more positive for occupations performing nonroutine interactive work and more negative for occupations concentrated in analytical, scientific, and operations-control skills. Automation Exposure | mixed | market-implied AI premium by occupational skill content |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| An occupation one standard deviation higher in interaction-and-communication content has 0.36-standard-deviation higher market-implied AI premium. Automation Exposure | positive | market-implied AI premium (standardized) per standard-deviation increase in interaction-and-communication content |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
0.36-standard-deviation higher
|
| We provide early evidence of the rise of the agentic economy. Innovation Output | positive | emergence/increase of agentic economic activity enabled by AI |
Reading fidelity
medium
Study strength
speculative
|
not reported
|