The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests About 🎲 Workforce Futures
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Co-authorship neighborhood

A bounded, provider-scoped projection of shared papers in this corpus. It is not a map of importance, influence, intellectual similarity, geography, or causal relationships.

Phongsakon Mark Konrad's displayed neighborhood

6 of 6 direct collaborators shown.

View profile
1Distinct papers
6Unique collaborators
6.0Full weighted degree
2026Active span
7Component size

Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect every displayed node.

Co-authorship neighborhood for Phongsakon Mark Konrad A deterministic circular layout of the focal author and up to 20 direct collaborators. Edge thickness represents full shared-paper weight. An ordered table follows the graphic. Phongsakon Mark Konrad A.C. Holst Merrild Rebecca Rosa Riccardo Terrenzi Serkan Ayvaz T. Tanyel Tim Lukas Adam
Circular placement is deterministic and only prevents overlap. Proximity and direction do not measure intellectual, geographic, social, or causal distance. Square = focal author; circles = collaborators; labels identify the focal and highest-weight neighbors.

Ordered author table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Accessible table equivalent for nodes in the displayed subgraph, ordered with the focal author first and collaborators by selected edge weight. Metrics use each node's full filtered provider scope, not only displayed edges.
Display orderAuthorRoleDistinct papersUnique collaboratorsWeighted degreeActive span
1 Phongsakon Mark Konrad Focal 1 6 6.0 2026
2 A.C. Holst Merrild Direct collaborator 1 6 6.0 2026
3 Rebecca Rosa Direct collaborator 1 6 6.0 2026
4 Riccardo Terrenzi Direct collaborator 1 6 6.0 2026
5 Serkan Ayvaz Direct collaborator 1 6 6.0 2026
6 T. Tanyel Direct collaborator 1 6 6.0 2026
7 Tim Lukas Adam Direct collaborator 1 6 6.0 2026

Displayed collaboration table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Undirected co-authorship edges among displayed authors. Each pair is listed once.
Author pairShared papersFull weightFractional weight
Serkan Ayvaz — Riccardo Terrenzi110.167
Serkan Ayvaz — A.C. Holst Merrild110.167
Serkan Ayvaz — Tim Lukas Adam110.167
Serkan Ayvaz — T. Tanyel110.167
Serkan Ayvaz — Phongsakon Mark Konrad110.167
Serkan Ayvaz — Rebecca Rosa110.167
Riccardo Terrenzi — A.C. Holst Merrild110.167
Riccardo Terrenzi — Tim Lukas Adam110.167
Riccardo Terrenzi — T. Tanyel110.167
Riccardo Terrenzi — Phongsakon Mark Konrad110.167
Riccardo Terrenzi — Rebecca Rosa110.167
A.C. Holst Merrild — Tim Lukas Adam110.167
A.C. Holst Merrild — T. Tanyel110.167
A.C. Holst Merrild — Phongsakon Mark Konrad110.167
A.C. Holst Merrild — Rebecca Rosa110.167
Tim Lukas Adam — T. Tanyel110.167
Tim Lukas Adam — Phongsakon Mark Konrad110.167
Tim Lukas Adam — Rebecca Rosa110.167
T. Tanyel — Phongsakon Mark Konrad110.167
T. Tanyel — Rebecca Rosa110.167
Phongsakon Mark Konrad — Rebecca Rosa110.167

Graph construction and limits

Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.

Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.

Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.