The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests About 🎲 Workforce Futures
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Co-authorship neighborhood

A bounded, provider-scoped projection of shared papers in this corpus. It is not a map of importance, influence, intellectual similarity, geography, or causal relationships.

Choose a focal author

No person is selected by default. Search or choose from the corpus/provider list below; the ordering reflects paper counts in this view, not importance.

  1. Jonathan H. Westover 9 papers · 0 collaborators · provider
  2. Ilia Sucholutsky 5 papers · 202 collaborators · provider
  3. Patricia Paskov 3 papers · 229 collaborators · provider
  4. Sanmi Koyejo 3 papers · 46 collaborators · provider
  5. K. Lin 3 papers · 32 collaborators · provider
  6. Amin Hass 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider
  7. Eranga Bandara 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider
  8. R. Mukkamala 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider
  9. Ross Gore 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider
  10. Sachini Rajapakse 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider
  11. T. Hewa 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider
  12. Xueping Liang 3 papers · 27 collaborators · provider

Graph construction and limits

Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.

Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.

Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.