Co-authorship neighborhood
Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos's displayed neighborhood
8 of 8 direct collaborators shown.
Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect every displayed node.
Ordered author table
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Display order | Author | Role | Distinct papers | Unique collaborators | Weighted degree | Active span |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos | Focal | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 2 | Aida Mehrad | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 3 | Elijah U. Akwantaghibe | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 4 | Gold C. Emenike | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 5 | H. Hayat | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 6 | I. D. Gyeabour | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 7 | Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 8 | S. Hammond | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
| 9 | Taiwo Fadiora | Direct collaborator | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | Unavailable |
Displayed collaboration table
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Author pair | Shared papers | Full weight | Fractional weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — Aida Mehrad | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — Taiwo Fadiora | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — Elijah U. Akwantaghibe | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — I. D. Gyeabour | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — S. Hammond | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohammad Hossein Tahriri Zangeneh — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — Taiwo Fadiora | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — Elijah U. Akwantaghibe | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — I. D. Gyeabour | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — S. Hammond | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Aida Mehrad — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Taiwo Fadiora — Elijah U. Akwantaghibe | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Taiwo Fadiora — Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Taiwo Fadiora — I. D. Gyeabour | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Taiwo Fadiora — S. Hammond | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Taiwo Fadiora — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Taiwo Fadiora — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Elijah U. Akwantaghibe — Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Elijah U. Akwantaghibe — I. D. Gyeabour | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Elijah U. Akwantaghibe — S. Hammond | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Elijah U. Akwantaghibe — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Elijah U. Akwantaghibe — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos — I. D. Gyeabour | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos — S. Hammond | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| Mohamed Niroz M. Thawoos — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| I. D. Gyeabour — S. Hammond | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| I. D. Gyeabour — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| I. D. Gyeabour — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| S. Hammond — H. Hayat | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| S. Hammond — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| H. Hayat — Gold C. Emenike | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
Graph construction and limits
Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.
Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.
Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.