The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests About 🎲 Workforce Futures
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Co-authorship neighborhood

A bounded, provider-scoped projection of shared papers in this corpus. It is not a map of importance, influence, intellectual similarity, geography, or causal relationships.

Xiangru Jian's displayed neighborhood

7 of 7 direct collaborators shown.

View profile
1Distinct papers
7Unique collaborators
7.0Full weighted degree
2026Active span
33Component size

Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect every displayed node.

Co-authorship neighborhood for Xiangru Jian A deterministic circular layout of the focal author and up to 20 direct collaborators. Edge thickness represents full shared-paper weight. An ordered table follows the graphic. Xiangru Jian Aarash Feizi K. Lin Kaixin Li Patrice Bechard Sai Rajeswar Shravan Nayak
Circular placement is deterministic and only prevents overlap. Proximity and direction do not measure intellectual, geographic, social, or causal distance. Square = focal author; circles = collaborators; labels identify the focal and highest-weight neighbors.

Ordered author table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Accessible table equivalent for nodes in the displayed subgraph, ordered with the focal author first and collaborators by selected edge weight. Metrics use each node's full filtered provider scope, not only displayed edges.
Display orderAuthorRoleDistinct papersUnique collaboratorsWeighted degreeActive span
1 Xiangru Jian Focal 1 7 7.0 2026
2 Aarash Feizi Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
3 K. Lin Direct collaborator 3 32 32.0 2026
4 Kaixin Li Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
5 Patrice Bechard Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
6 Sai Rajeswar Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
7 Shravan Nayak Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
8 Spandana Gella Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026

Displayed collaboration table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Undirected co-authorship edges among displayed authors. Each pair is listed once.
Author pairShared papersFull weightFractional weight
Shravan Nayak — Spandana Gella110.143
Shravan Nayak — Xiangru Jian110.143
Shravan Nayak — K. Lin110.143
Shravan Nayak — Sai Rajeswar110.143
Shravan Nayak — Patrice Bechard110.143
Shravan Nayak — Aarash Feizi110.143
Shravan Nayak — Kaixin Li110.143
Spandana Gella — Xiangru Jian110.143
Spandana Gella — K. Lin110.143
Spandana Gella — Sai Rajeswar110.143
Spandana Gella — Patrice Bechard110.143
Spandana Gella — Aarash Feizi110.143
Spandana Gella — Kaixin Li110.143
Xiangru Jian — K. Lin110.143
Xiangru Jian — Sai Rajeswar110.143
Xiangru Jian — Patrice Bechard110.143
Xiangru Jian — Aarash Feizi110.143
Xiangru Jian — Kaixin Li110.143
K. Lin — Sai Rajeswar110.143
K. Lin — Patrice Bechard110.143
K. Lin — Aarash Feizi110.143
K. Lin — Kaixin Li110.143
Sai Rajeswar — Patrice Bechard110.143
Sai Rajeswar — Aarash Feizi110.143
Sai Rajeswar — Kaixin Li110.143
Patrice Bechard — Aarash Feizi110.143
Patrice Bechard — Kaixin Li110.143
Aarash Feizi — Kaixin Li110.143

Graph construction and limits

Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.

Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.

Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.