The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests About 🎲 Workforce Futures
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Co-authorship neighborhood

A bounded, provider-scoped projection of shared papers in this corpus. It is not a map of importance, influence, intellectual similarity, geography, or causal relationships.

Adina Yakefu's displayed neighborhood

7 of 7 direct collaborators shown.

View profile
1Distinct papers
7Unique collaborators
7.0Full weighted degree
2025Active span
8Component size

Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect every displayed node.

Co-authorship neighborhood for Adina Yakefu A deterministic circular layout of the focal author and up to 20 direct collaborators. Edge thickness represents full shared-paper weight. An ordered table follows the graphic. Adina Yakefu Haoyu Dong Mingzhe Lu Pengkun Zhang Shuxin Zheng Xuanyu Dong Yan Gao
Circular placement is deterministic and only prevents overlap. Proximity and direction do not measure intellectual, geographic, social, or causal distance. Square = focal author; circles = collaborators; labels identify the focal and highest-weight neighbors.

Ordered author table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Accessible table equivalent for nodes in the displayed subgraph, ordered with the focal author first and collaborators by selected edge weight. Metrics use each node's full filtered provider scope, not only displayed edges.
Display orderAuthorRoleDistinct papersUnique collaboratorsWeighted degreeActive span
1 Adina Yakefu Focal 1 7 7.0 2025
2 Haoyu Dong Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025
3 Mingzhe Lu Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025
4 Pengkun Zhang Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025
5 Shuxin Zheng Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025
6 Xuanyu Dong Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025
7 Yan Gao Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025
8 Yilin Cheng Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2025

Displayed collaboration table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Undirected co-authorship edges among displayed authors. Each pair is listed once.
Author pairShared papersFull weightFractional weight
Yan Gao — Xuanyu Dong110.143
Yan Gao — Yilin Cheng110.143
Yan Gao — Adina Yakefu110.143
Yan Gao — Haoyu Dong110.143
Yan Gao — Mingzhe Lu110.143
Yan Gao — Pengkun Zhang110.143
Yan Gao — Shuxin Zheng110.143
Xuanyu Dong — Yilin Cheng110.143
Xuanyu Dong — Adina Yakefu110.143
Xuanyu Dong — Haoyu Dong110.143
Xuanyu Dong — Mingzhe Lu110.143
Xuanyu Dong — Pengkun Zhang110.143
Xuanyu Dong — Shuxin Zheng110.143
Yilin Cheng — Adina Yakefu110.143
Yilin Cheng — Haoyu Dong110.143
Yilin Cheng — Mingzhe Lu110.143
Yilin Cheng — Pengkun Zhang110.143
Yilin Cheng — Shuxin Zheng110.143
Adina Yakefu — Haoyu Dong110.143
Adina Yakefu — Mingzhe Lu110.143
Adina Yakefu — Pengkun Zhang110.143
Adina Yakefu — Shuxin Zheng110.143
Haoyu Dong — Mingzhe Lu110.143
Haoyu Dong — Pengkun Zhang110.143
Haoyu Dong — Shuxin Zheng110.143
Mingzhe Lu — Pengkun Zhang110.143
Mingzhe Lu — Shuxin Zheng110.143
Pengkun Zhang — Shuxin Zheng110.143

Graph construction and limits

Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.

Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.

Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.