The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests About 🎲 Workforce Futures
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Co-authorship neighborhood

A bounded, provider-scoped projection of shared papers in this corpus. It is not a map of importance, influence, intellectual similarity, geography, or causal relationships.

Haohuan Fu's displayed neighborhood

7 of 7 direct collaborators shown.

View profile
1Distinct papers
7Unique collaborators
7.0Full weighted degree
2026Active span
8Component size

Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect every displayed node.

Co-authorship neighborhood for Haohuan Fu A deterministic circular layout of the focal author and up to 20 direct collaborators. Edge thickness represents full shared-paper weight. An ordered table follows the graphic. Haohuan Fu Gengmeng Pu Guilong Xiao Haochen Li Jianxi Huang Juepeng Zheng Kaiqi Du
Circular placement is deterministic and only prevents overlap. Proximity and direction do not measure intellectual, geographic, social, or causal distance. Square = focal author; circles = collaborators; labels identify the focal and highest-weight neighbors.

Ordered author table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Accessible table equivalent for nodes in the displayed subgraph, ordered with the focal author first and collaborators by selected edge weight. Metrics use each node's full filtered provider scope, not only displayed edges.
Display orderAuthorRoleDistinct papersUnique collaboratorsWeighted degreeActive span
1 Haohuan Fu Focal 1 7 7.0 2026
2 Gengmeng Pu Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
3 Guilong Xiao Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
4 Haochen Li Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
5 Jianxi Huang Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
6 Juepeng Zheng Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
7 Kaiqi Du Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
8 Zenghao Yang Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026

Displayed collaboration table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Undirected co-authorship edges among displayed authors. Each pair is listed once.
Author pairShared papersFull weightFractional weight
Kaiqi Du — Haochen Li110.143
Kaiqi Du — Guilong Xiao110.143
Kaiqi Du — Juepeng Zheng110.143
Kaiqi Du — Zenghao Yang110.143
Kaiqi Du — Jianxi Huang110.143
Kaiqi Du — Haohuan Fu110.143
Kaiqi Du — Gengmeng Pu110.143
Haochen Li — Guilong Xiao110.143
Haochen Li — Juepeng Zheng110.143
Haochen Li — Zenghao Yang110.143
Haochen Li — Jianxi Huang110.143
Haochen Li — Haohuan Fu110.143
Haochen Li — Gengmeng Pu110.143
Guilong Xiao — Juepeng Zheng110.143
Guilong Xiao — Zenghao Yang110.143
Guilong Xiao — Jianxi Huang110.143
Guilong Xiao — Haohuan Fu110.143
Guilong Xiao — Gengmeng Pu110.143
Juepeng Zheng — Zenghao Yang110.143
Juepeng Zheng — Jianxi Huang110.143
Juepeng Zheng — Haohuan Fu110.143
Juepeng Zheng — Gengmeng Pu110.143
Zenghao Yang — Jianxi Huang110.143
Zenghao Yang — Haohuan Fu110.143
Zenghao Yang — Gengmeng Pu110.143
Jianxi Huang — Haohuan Fu110.143
Jianxi Huang — Gengmeng Pu110.143
Haohuan Fu — Gengmeng Pu110.143

Graph construction and limits

Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.

Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.

Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.