The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests About 🎲 Workforce Futures
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Co-authorship neighborhood

A bounded, provider-scoped projection of shared papers in this corpus. It is not a map of importance, influence, intellectual similarity, geography, or causal relationships.

Jianmin Wang's displayed neighborhood

7 of 7 direct collaborators shown.

View profile
1Distinct papers
7Unique collaborators
7.0Full weighted degree
2026Active span
8Component size

Scroll the diagram horizontally to inspect every displayed node.

Co-authorship neighborhood for Jianmin Wang A deterministic circular layout of the focal author and up to 20 direct collaborators. Edge thickness represents full shared-paper weight. An ordered table follows the graphic. Jianmin Wang Binzhu Li Chen Wang Hao Wei Mingsheng Long Shenglin Weng Yunzhong Qiu
Circular placement is deterministic and only prevents overlap. Proximity and direction do not measure intellectual, geographic, social, or causal distance. Square = focal author; circles = collaborators; labels identify the focal and highest-weight neighbors.

Ordered author table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Accessible table equivalent for nodes in the displayed subgraph, ordered with the focal author first and collaborators by selected edge weight. Metrics use each node's full filtered provider scope, not only displayed edges.
Display orderAuthorRoleDistinct papersUnique collaboratorsWeighted degreeActive span
1 Jianmin Wang Focal 1 7 7.0 2026
2 Binzhu Li Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
3 Chen Wang Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
4 Hao Wei Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
5 Mingsheng Long Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
6 Shenglin Weng Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
7 Yunzhong Qiu Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026
8 Zhongyi Pei Direct collaborator 1 7 7.0 2026

Displayed collaboration table

Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.

Undirected co-authorship edges among displayed authors. Each pair is listed once.
Author pairShared papersFull weightFractional weight
Shenglin Weng — Chen Wang110.143
Shenglin Weng — Yunzhong Qiu110.143
Shenglin Weng — Jianmin Wang110.143
Shenglin Weng — Mingsheng Long110.143
Shenglin Weng — Zhongyi Pei110.143
Shenglin Weng — Hao Wei110.143
Shenglin Weng — Binzhu Li110.143
Chen Wang — Yunzhong Qiu110.143
Chen Wang — Jianmin Wang110.143
Chen Wang — Mingsheng Long110.143
Chen Wang — Zhongyi Pei110.143
Chen Wang — Hao Wei110.143
Chen Wang — Binzhu Li110.143
Yunzhong Qiu — Jianmin Wang110.143
Yunzhong Qiu — Mingsheng Long110.143
Yunzhong Qiu — Zhongyi Pei110.143
Yunzhong Qiu — Hao Wei110.143
Yunzhong Qiu — Binzhu Li110.143
Jianmin Wang — Mingsheng Long110.143
Jianmin Wang — Zhongyi Pei110.143
Jianmin Wang — Hao Wei110.143
Jianmin Wang — Binzhu Li110.143
Mingsheng Long — Zhongyi Pei110.143
Mingsheng Long — Hao Wei110.143
Mingsheng Long — Binzhu Li110.143
Zhongyi Pei — Hao Wei110.143
Zhongyi Pei — Binzhu Li110.143
Hao Wei — Binzhu Li110.143

Graph construction and limits

Each distinct paper contributes an undirected pair for every two eligible identities in its deduplicated latest Semantic Scholar author list. Self-loops are removed. Solo papers count toward an author's paper total but create no edge. The selected display is an ego subgraph. Paper, collaborator, weighted-degree, and active-span metrics for every displayed node use the full filtered provider view; component size describes the focal author's component.

Immutable provider payloads are stored once. A separate receipt log records a later delivery of an earlier payload, so roster reversions remain visible. Exact duplicate receipts are idempotent. Equal timestamps use receipt insertion order as the tie-breaker.

Co-authorship records shared paper attribution only. It does not establish contribution size, research quality, influence, friendship, topic similarity, or citation relationships.