Evidence (4892 claims)
Search and filter individual claims pulled from the papers. Looking for a specific finding ("what's the effect on wages?"), you're in the right place. Want to compare whole outcome categories against each other instead? Use the Evidence Explorer.
The board below groups claims two ways: by broad theme (nine paper-level topics) and by outcome category (the 34 claim-level outcomes that the Explorer and Syntheses also use).
Browse by theme
Nine broad, paper-level topics. Click one to filter the claims below.
Adoption
9875 claims
Filter claims →
Productivity
8807 claims
Filter claims →
Governance
7870 claims
Filter claims →
Human-AI Collaboration
7560 claims
Filter claims →
Org Design
4892 claims
Filtered →
Innovation
4781 claims
Filter claims →
Labor Markets
4004 claims
Filter claims →
Skills & Training
3308 claims
Filter claims →
Inequality
2332 claims
Filter claims →
Claims by outcome category
Counts by direction of finding. These are the same 34 outcome categories the Explorer compares and the Syntheses are written for. A linked row has a published synthesis.
| Outcome | Positive | Negative | Mixed | Null | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 870 | 233 | 116 | 1066 | 2363 |
| Governance & Regulation | 976 | 451 | 218 | 133 | 1809 |
| Organizational Efficiency | 949 | 224 | 144 | 88 | 1416 |
| Technology Adoption Rate | 764 | 287 | 141 | 122 | 1325 |
| Research Productivity | 501 | 152 | 74 | 362 | 1101 |
| Output Quality | 542 | 216 | 69 | 69 | 896 |
| Decision Quality | 387 | 198 | 94 | 54 | 740 |
| Firm Productivity | 513 | 67 | 101 | 27 | 714 |
| AI Safety & Ethics | 249 | 303 | 73 | 36 | 667 |
| Market Structure | 190 | 192 | 134 | 27 | 548 |
| Task Allocation | 243 | 77 | 91 | 36 | 452 |
| Innovation Output | 291 | 33 | 55 | 20 | 401 |
| Skill Acquisition | 206 | 72 | 65 | 21 | 364 |
| Employment Level | 133 | 63 | 115 | 22 | 335 |
| Fiscal & Macroeconomic | 153 | 79 | 52 | 32 | 323 |
| Task Completion Time | 206 | 37 | 12 | 15 | 272 |
| Firm Revenue | 179 | 52 | 29 | 5 | 266 |
| Consumer Welfare | 130 | 76 | 47 | 13 | 266 |
| Inequality Measures | 48 | 137 | 51 | 6 | 242 |
| Worker Satisfaction | 101 | 81 | 25 | 13 | 220 |
| Error Rate | 84 | 110 | 11 | 5 | 210 |
| Wages & Compensation | 98 | 47 | 30 | 10 | 185 |
| Regulatory Compliance | 88 | 73 | 17 | 7 | 185 |
| Automation Exposure | 66 | 64 | 33 | 16 | 182 |
| Team Performance | 105 | 29 | 30 | 11 | 176 |
| Training Effectiveness | 109 | 22 | 14 | 21 | 168 |
| Developer Productivity | 114 | 21 | 14 | 8 | 158 |
| Job Displacement | 12 | 90 | 24 | 1 | 127 |
| Hiring & Recruitment | 57 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 80 |
| Skill Obsolescence | 6 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 72 |
| Social Protection | 43 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 70 |
| Creative Output | 35 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 70 |
| Labor Share of Income | 18 | 21 | 17 | 1 | 57 |
| Worker Turnover | 15 | 16 | — | 4 | 35 |
| Industry | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
Org Design
Remove filter
Workers were assigned to no overrides, free overrides, or a two-per-machine limit on downward overrides.
Experimental design statement in paper: randomized assignment into three arms (no overrides, free overrides, constrained two-per-machine downward override limit).
We tested [the policy] through a randomized field experiment with 553 workers at a major Chinese smart vending machine retailer that manages more than 59,000 machines and 4,000 SKUs.
Randomized field experiment described in paper; sample stated as 553 workers and operational context (retailer with >59,000 machines and >4,000 SKUs).
The framework is intended primarily as a scholarly contribution to clarify the conceptual landscape and support future theoretical and empirical work, not as prescriptive guidance for practitioners.
Authors' explicit statement of intent in the abstract describing the purpose and scope of the proposed framework.
The authors propose a conceptual framework that classifies human–AI relationships into four categories—symbiotic, augmented, assisted, and substituted intelligence—according to the level of AI autonomy and human involvement.
Authors' conceptual synthesis and proposal based on thematic mapping and literature synthesis (framework described in abstract as an output of analysis).
This study employs a bibliometric co-word analysis of 4093 peer-reviewed documents indexed in Scopus to map the intellectual structure of the field.
Authors report performing a bibliometric co-word analysis on 4,093 peer-reviewed documents from the Scopus database (method stated in abstract).
The docs CLI used in the constrained condition is approximately 200 lines of code (~200 LoC).
Paper text states the CLI used is about 200 lines of code.
We report a controlled experiment in scalable oversight: a small reviewer (Gemma 4 e4b) inspects a Python codebase containing 11 inserted backdoors.
Described controlled experiment in the paper: a single automated reviewer (Gemma 4 e4b) evaluated a Python codebase where the authors inserted 11 backdoors.
The paper synthesizes evidence drawing on reports from the World Economic Forum, PwC, McKinsey Global Institute, Gartner, and the International Monetary Fund.
Literature/report synthesis explicitly described in the paper (citation list to those organizations).
We detect no negative spillovers on contact rates or exit-to-job rates for unemployed German or other immigrant job seekers, finding no evidence of resource reallocation or displacement.
Placebo/spillover analyses comparing contact rates and exit-to-job rates for unemployed German and other immigrant job seekers in the same public employment service offices before and after program rollout using administrative panel data and difference-in-differences methods.
ATHENA is not presented as a validated measurement instrument; rather, it is a conceptual and methodological scaffold for empirical validation and responsible organizational experimentation.
Explicit qualification in the paper that ATHENA is a conceptual scaffold and has not been validated as a measurement instrument (stated limitation).
The research adopts a theory-building design based on historical-comparative analysis, institutional analysis, and conceptual synthesis, integrating multiple theoretical traditions (Marxist political economy, Keynesian welfare theory, sustainable development approaches, stakeholder governance theory, and AI governance literature).
Stated methodology and literature integration in the paper; factual description of methods used by the author(s).
The study develops an integrated theoretical framework explaining the role of AI in the transformation of the welfare state and corporate governance within the context of sustainable development.
Paper reports a theory-building design integrating Marxist political economy, Keynesian welfare theory, sustainable development approaches, stakeholder governance theory, and AI governance literature; methodological description rather than empirical validation.
This study is the first to theorize the relationship between organizations' agentic AI adoption and circular procurement performance.
Author statement in the abstract claiming novelty of theory contribution (literature review / positioning claim).
The analysis in the paper was conducted using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) and a Process analytical method.
Methods described in the abstract (explicitly names the analytical techniques used).
Data for this study were collected from a developing nation.
Explicit statement in the abstract indicating the sample source/setting for the empirical data.
This study used survey data from 426 AI-adopting Chinese manufacturing firms and analyzed hypothesized relationships using hierarchical regression to isolate moderating effects of supply chain integration.
Methodological statement reported in the paper.
The study used survey data from 289 supply chain executives in Taiwan’s electronics sector and employed PLS-SEM as the primary quantitative analysis method.
Methods statement in the paper summary specifying sample (289 supply chain executives, Taiwan electronics sector) and analysis method (PLS-SEM).
We conclude by outlining implications for designing and evaluating human-AI teams as socio-technical systems and for prioritizing longitudinal and in-context studies that capture how teaming evolves over time.
Authors' conclusions and recommendations based on the systematic review and observed gaps in the literature (noted need for longitudinal, in-context studies).
Bibliometric patterns suggest a shift since 2020 from foundational demonstrations in controlled settings toward applied, higher-stakes contexts where trust dynamics, communication, and ethical accountability more directly shape adoption and sustained performance.
Bibliometric analysis of the 104 studies showing temporal trends (pre- vs post-2020) in research contexts and topics.
Across studies, performance was the most frequently examined aspect, followed by trust, explainability and transparency, decision-making, and team processes.
Synthesis and frequency coding of outcomes/measured constructs across the 104 included empirical studies.
Gaming and entertainment, aviation, military and defense operations, emergency response and public safety, and healthcare also represented substantial portions of the literature.
Domain breakdown from the systematic review of 104 empirical studies (frequency counts by domain reported in Results).
Cross-domain and interdisciplinary studies were the largest category, representing broad workplace or team-based investigations not tied to a single industry and instead focused on general collaboration issues such as communication, teamwork, coordination, and coworker interaction.
Categorization / coding of the 104 included empirical studies; frequency counts by study domain reported in review.
We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review with bibliometric analysis of 104 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 and identified through Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science.
Methods reported in paper: PRISMA-guided systematic review and bibliometric analysis; explicit statement of 104 peer-reviewed empirical studies and databases searched (Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science).
Order, entropy, information, and useful energy are task-dependent and system-relative concepts whose meanings depend on the objectives of the system.
Conceptual argument and discussion in the paper about the context-dependence of informational and energetic notions within the proposed framework; no empirical evidence provided.
The paper proposes seven v1.1 protocols to test whether specific recommendations can causally improve AI visibility.
Methods/protocols proposed in the paper (not an empirical finding; a set of seven experimental/testing protocols offered as next-step guidance).
We analyze 100K+ prompt responses across 100+ brands tracked on Ranqo between March and May 2026.
Descriptive methods statement in the paper: dataset of 100K+ AI prompt responses collected via Ranqo covering 100+ distinct brands over the period March–May 2026.
We study shared-workspace human-AI teams using the Collaborative Gym environment with DiscoveryBench tasks.
Methodological description in the paper stating the experimental environment and task suite used.
We ran 1,482 sessions in our experiments.
Statement in the paper reporting total experimental sessions (Collaborative Gym + DiscoveryBench).
The article presents a comprehensive framework spanning macro-level governance principles and micro-level interaction typologies, illustrated through case examples from telecommunications, retail, insurance, and consumer products sectors.
Descriptive/methodological claim in the paper indicating the presence of a framework and sectoral case examples (no quantitative sample sizes reported for cases).
The article draws on Deloitte's 2026 Global Human Capital Trends survey of over 3,000 business leaders across 15 countries.
Methodological/data source statement explicitly provided in the paper.
A 2015-2017 backward extension (224 firms, 601 observations) supplies pre-treatment data and provides evidence against pre-existing upward-trend confounds in SG&A-to-revenue.
Additional panel extension covering 2015-2017 with 224 firms and 601 firm-year observations, used to test pre-trends.
In practice, decision makers are often constrained to adjusting coarser levers within existing prediction pipelines (e.g., excluding perceived-manipulable features and using standard regularization).
Stated observation about practical constraints in applied settings (motivating assumption described in abstract).
The study contributes theoretically by integrating perspectives from productivity economics, public administration, and systemic risk within a sociotechnical systems framework; empirically by providing a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on AI and public sector productivity; and methodologically by applying transparent PRISMA 2020 review procedures.
Author-stated contributions supported by the paper's literature integration, systematic review (68 studies), and use of PRISMA 2020 methods.
This study systematically reviews 68 peer reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 using PRISMA 2020 methodology.
Methods statement in the paper describing the systematic review procedure and sample of included studies.
During preparation of the dissertation, I used generative AI tool ChatGPT for limited language assistance (grammar correction, stylistic refinement, and improving clarity); the intellectual content is entirely the author's own.
Author statement in the dissertation (declaration of use of ChatGPT for language assistance).
We study brand dynamics in LLM recommendations using skincare products across three commercial LLMs (GPT-4o-mini, Claude Sonnet, Gemini 3 Flash).
Methods statement in the paper: experiments conducted on three named commercial LLMs using skincare product prompts; described as three experiments with a robustness check on search goods.
The paper proposes an integration framework covering use case suitability, autonomy levels, technical integration, governance, security, employee enablement, and measurable impact.
Paper presents a proposed framework (descriptive; the existence of the proposal is internal to the paper).
Unlike traditional automation or conversational AI, agentic systems can interpret goals, plan multi-step tasks, access tools, interact with enterprise systems, and execute workflows with varying degrees of autonomy.
Descriptive definition and capability listing in the paper (conceptual/technical description). No empirical validation provided.
Agentic AI marks a new phase of enterprise automation.
Author's high-level claim in the paper (conceptual/position statement). No empirical data or sample reported.
We provide a candid assessment of the problems Mojo does and does not yet solve.
Paper claims to include evaluative discussion of limitations and unsolved problems; descriptive statement about paper content.
Larger-scale GPU workload results are projections calibrated from published benchmarks.
Paper states that larger GPU results are not directly measured but are projections calibrated using published benchmarks; no calibration dataset size given in the excerpt.
We benchmark four core financial AI workloads: Monte Carlo option pricing, LLM sentiment inference, multi-asset backtesting, and portfolio Value at Risk.
Paper reports that these four workloads were benchmarked (method: benchmarking); number of distinct workload types = 4.
A pilot deployment in Newham's secure environment evaluated operational performance relative to manual workflows.
Paper reports a pilot deployment and an operational evaluation comparing DOMUS to existing manual workflows (method: pilot deployment; specifics such as duration or sample size not stated in provided text).
Internal control reliability is an important condition for understanding AI-related organizational outcomes.
Author conclusion/interpretation in paper, motivated by empirical findings linking AI investment and ICD risk and by heterogeneity results.
AI investment is measured using capitalized AI-related assets identified from financial-statement footnotes.
Measurement description in paper: AI investment proxy constructed from capitalized AI-related assets extracted from firms' financial-statement footnotes.
The study uses 41,725 firm-year observations from Chinese A-share listed firms.
Descriptive statement of sample in paper; sample drawn from Chinese A-share listed firms and reported as 41,725 firm-year observations.
In evaluation runs, the evaluated model controls one coffee roaster while the remaining firms are controlled by fixed reference agents.
Experimental setup described in the paper: one roaster is controlled by the model under test; other five firms use fixed reference agents.
Each firm in CoffeeBench seeks to maximize cumulative net income through communication and transactions while managing cash, inventory, and pricing.
Specification of agent objectives and state variables in the benchmark design (cumulative net income objective; resources: cash, inventory; decision variables: pricing and transactions).
CoffeeBench simulates an economy of two farmers, two roasters, and two retailers operating autonomously over a 90-day simulation.
Environment description in the paper specifying the number and types of firms and the 90-day simulation horizon.
The study analyzed three-wave survey data from 312 employees from China.
Three-wave longitudinal survey; sample described as 312 employees in China (N=312) used for empirical analyses.