Evidence (4004 claims)
Search and filter individual claims pulled from the papers. Looking for a specific finding ("what's the effect on wages?"), you're in the right place. Want to compare whole outcome categories against each other instead? Use the Evidence Explorer.
The board below groups claims two ways: by broad theme (nine paper-level topics) and by outcome category (the 34 claim-level outcomes that the Explorer and Syntheses also use).
Browse by theme
Nine broad, paper-level topics. Click one to filter the claims below.
Adoption
9875 claims
Filter claims →
Productivity
8807 claims
Filter claims →
Governance
7870 claims
Filter claims →
Human-AI Collaboration
7560 claims
Filter claims →
Org Design
4892 claims
Filter claims →
Innovation
4781 claims
Filter claims →
Labor Markets
4004 claims
Filtered →
Skills & Training
3308 claims
Filter claims →
Inequality
2332 claims
Filter claims →
Claims by outcome category
Counts by direction of finding. These are the same 34 outcome categories the Explorer compares and the Syntheses are written for. A linked row has a published synthesis.
| Outcome | Positive | Negative | Mixed | Null | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 870 | 233 | 116 | 1066 | 2363 |
| Governance & Regulation | 976 | 451 | 218 | 133 | 1809 |
| Organizational Efficiency | 949 | 224 | 144 | 88 | 1416 |
| Technology Adoption Rate | 764 | 287 | 141 | 122 | 1325 |
| Research Productivity | 501 | 152 | 74 | 362 | 1101 |
| Output Quality | 542 | 216 | 69 | 69 | 896 |
| Decision Quality | 387 | 198 | 94 | 54 | 740 |
| Firm Productivity | 513 | 67 | 101 | 27 | 714 |
| AI Safety & Ethics | 249 | 303 | 73 | 36 | 667 |
| Market Structure | 190 | 192 | 134 | 27 | 548 |
| Task Allocation | 243 | 77 | 91 | 36 | 452 |
| Innovation Output | 291 | 33 | 55 | 20 | 401 |
| Skill Acquisition | 206 | 72 | 65 | 21 | 364 |
| Employment Level | 133 | 63 | 115 | 22 | 335 |
| Fiscal & Macroeconomic | 153 | 79 | 52 | 32 | 323 |
| Task Completion Time | 206 | 37 | 12 | 15 | 272 |
| Firm Revenue | 179 | 52 | 29 | 5 | 266 |
| Consumer Welfare | 130 | 76 | 47 | 13 | 266 |
| Inequality Measures | 48 | 137 | 51 | 6 | 242 |
| Worker Satisfaction | 101 | 81 | 25 | 13 | 220 |
| Error Rate | 84 | 110 | 11 | 5 | 210 |
| Wages & Compensation | 98 | 47 | 30 | 10 | 185 |
| Regulatory Compliance | 88 | 73 | 17 | 7 | 185 |
| Automation Exposure | 66 | 64 | 33 | 16 | 182 |
| Team Performance | 105 | 29 | 30 | 11 | 176 |
| Training Effectiveness | 109 | 22 | 14 | 21 | 168 |
| Developer Productivity | 114 | 21 | 14 | 8 | 158 |
| Job Displacement | 12 | 90 | 24 | 1 | 127 |
| Hiring & Recruitment | 57 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 80 |
| Skill Obsolescence | 6 | 56 | 9 | 1 | 72 |
| Social Protection | 43 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 70 |
| Creative Output | 35 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 70 |
| Labor Share of Income | 18 | 21 | 17 | 1 | 57 |
| Worker Turnover | 15 | 16 | — | 4 | 35 |
| Industry | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
Labor Markets
Remove filter
Guerreiro et al. (2022) characterize optimal Mirrleesian tax system with automation and find that robot taxes should be transitional—high when incumbent workers cannot retrain, converging to zero as new cohorts adjust skill investments.
Citation reported in the paper summarizing Guerreiro et al. (2022)'s theoretical result on transitional robot taxes.
If labor becomes economically redundant, the policy focus shifts from steering innovation to redesigning public finance and redistribution (e.g., new tax instruments, redistribution mechanisms).
Theoretical scenario analysis in the paper with references to related works (Korinek and Juelfs 2024; Korinek and Lockwood 2026).
We critically compare LLM-generated rulings against 10,000 real-world court judgments from China Judgments Online (CJOL).
Dataset statement: the paper compares model outputs to a corpus of 10,000 CJOL labor dispute judgments.
We introduce a novel stress test that evaluates LLM-generated labor dispute outcomes by injecting social media sentiment as an external pressure.
Methodological description in the paper: a designed stress test where social media sentiment is used to perturb LLM outputs for labor dispute cases.
Economic evaluations of GLAI should account for end-to-end risk externalities (error propagation, institutional trust, rights impacts), not only short-term productivity gains.
Methodological recommendation grounded in conceptual synthesis of technical, behavioral, and legal risks; normative argument rather than empirical result.
Generative Legal AI (GLAI) systems are built on token-prediction (LLM) architectures rather than formal legal-reasoning architectures.
Conceptual and technical analysis in the paper distinguishing GLAI from other legal-tech; literature synthesis on common LLM architectures. No original empirical dataset or sample size—qualitative/technical review.
Productivity effects at the aggregate (economy-wide) level are delayed relative to firm-level gains.
Cross-study synthesis noting temporal lags between observed firm-level productivity improvements and measurable aggregate effects in the literature included in the SLR.
The review followed the PRISMA protocol and synthesized 78 peer-reviewed studies and institutional reports published between 2015 and 2025.
Systematic Literature Review using PRISMA protocol; sample of 78 peer-reviewed studies and institutional reports (2015–2025) as described in the paper.
Additional analyses reveal no statistically significant heterogeneity in the AI exposure — working-hours relationship by employment type, flexible working arrangements, labour union membership or part-time employment status.
Heterogeneity/subgroup analyses reported in the paper comparing effect estimates across groups defined by employment type, flexible work, union membership, and part-time status (no significant differences found).
No statistically significant differences in working-hour trends by AI exposure are observed in 2020 and 2021, consistent with the parallel-trends assumption.
Pre-treatment (pre-2022) event-study estimates reported in the analysis showing no significant differences in 2020–2021.
This study constructs a Korean AI Industry Exposure Index.
Methodological description in the paper: the authors report building an industry-level index measuring AI exposure for Korean industries (used in the subsequent empirical analysis).
Results are robust to state-by-year and industry-by-year fixed effects.
Robustness checks reported in paper that include state-by-year and industry-by-year fixed effects with results stated to hold.
Where AI can perform tasks independently, we find no significant employment effect.
Heterogeneous DiD estimates showing null (statistically non-significant) employment coefficients for occupations/industries where AI can perform tasks independently.
We examine aggregate effects using administrative data covering essentially all U.S. employers in a difference-in-differences design exploiting occupational AI exposure across industries and states.
Statement in paper describing data and empirical strategy: administrative data covering essentially all U.S. employers; difference-in-differences design exploiting occupational AI exposure variation across industries and states.
This suggests the apparent post-2022 decline reflects, at least in part, pre-existing secular trends rather than a clean AI-period break.
Interpretation based on the backdating exercise and the pattern of estimates (larger absolute estimates for backdated dates), leading the authors to infer pre-existing trends contributed to observed post-2022 declines.
We find no robust response across other age cohorts or on incumbent labor-market outcomes.
Paper reports null/insignificant findings across other age cohorts and for incumbent labor-market outcomes using the same empirical approaches.
We find no robust evidence of employment displacement among young workers in highly AI-exposed occupations.
Estimation results from the cited DiD and supplementary designs applied to population-wide Norwegian registers; paper states no robust displacement for young workers in highly AI-exposed occupations.
We provide population-wide evidence from Norwegian administrative registers, 2015 through March 2025.
Population-wide Norwegian administrative registers covering 2015–March 2025, as stated in the paper.
The study uses difference-in-differences linear regressions on 2023 and 2024 KBO season data to identify the causal impact of ABS adoption by player status.
Methods statement in paper: difference-in-differences linear regressions; sample sizes reported as n = 148 batters and n = 112 pitchers.
High-status pitchers' performance remains unaffected by ABS adoption.
Difference-in-differences linear regressions using KBO 2023 and 2024 season data for pitchers (n = 112); paper reports no detectable change for high-status pitchers.
The Korea Baseball Organization (KBO) officially implemented the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS) in 2024.
Paper statement of policy change and use of 2023 and 2024 KBO season data; presented as factual background to the natural experiment.
Wages of labor that is used only in final goods production and is not displaced by AI increase in line with overall GDP.
Analytical economic model result indicating proportional wage growth for final-goods-only labor relative to GDP. No empirical sample reported.
The paper synthesizes evidence drawing on reports from the World Economic Forum, PwC, McKinsey Global Institute, Gartner, and the International Monetary Fund.
Literature/report synthesis explicitly described in the paper (citation list to those organizations).
The AI premium is not present for loadings on casual use or open-weight (open-source) model use.
Decomposition analysis showing null or weaker relation between AI premium and loadings on casual usage metrics and open-weight/open-source model consumption.
We construct a high-frequency AI Factor from growth in tokens, dollars, and users, estimate firm-level AI Betas from stock return comovement, and characterize the AI Premium.
Methodological claim based on constructing a factor (AI Factor) using metrics of tokens, dollars, and users; estimating firm-level betas via stock return comovement.
The analysis uses 380 trillion tokens of realized AI consumption across more than four hundred large language models from the licensed proprietary OpenRouter dataset covering approximately 2 percent of current global monthly AI token consumption.
Descriptive statement about the dataset used: OpenRouter licensed proprietary dataset; 380 trillion tokens; >400 LLMs; coverage ≈2% of global monthly AI token consumption.
New generation panel data methods were applied, taking into account cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity across countries.
Methodological description in the paper indicating use of advanced panel techniques that account for cross-sectional dependence (common shocks/spillovers) and heterogeneity (institutional/structural differences).
This study examines the determinants of economic growth in the 27 countries with the highest GDP for the period 2008–2020.
Study sample and period explicitly stated in the paper: the 27 highest-GDP countries, years 2008–2020.
The study employed a simplified multiple criteria assessment methodology based on global and regional expert evaluations of education quality determining knowledge and innovation development.
Methodological statement in the paper describing the approach used to analyze the Visegrad and Baltic states over 2022–2025; implies use of expert evaluations and multiple-criteria assessment.
This study systematically reviewed 194 peer-reviewed articles published between 2011 and 2025.
Statement in the paper's abstract describing a systematic review of 194 peer-reviewed articles (2011–2025).
We detect no negative spillovers on contact rates or exit-to-job rates for unemployed German or other immigrant job seekers, finding no evidence of resource reallocation or displacement.
Placebo/spillover analyses comparing contact rates and exit-to-job rates for unemployed German and other immigrant job seekers in the same public employment service offices before and after program rollout using administrative panel data and difference-in-differences methods.
Moderation analysis: Regional AI development and supportive policies have limited impact on the effect of AI adoption on gender composition.
Moderation models interacting AI adoption with regional policy/industry measures when predicting male-to-female employment ratios; reported limited/modest moderation effects.
Scholars remain divided on AI’s implications for the future of work, with debate centred on what AI can do to jobs rather than on the economic regime shaping how it is deployed and who appropriates its returns.
Literature review / conceptual observation by the author(s); argumentative claim based on survey of scholarly debate in political economy and sociology (no empirical sample reported).
A limitation of the study is that using occupation-level data prevents capturing within-occupation wage heterogeneity.
Paper statement of research limitations indicating occupation-level data as a constraint to measuring within-occupation variation.
The AI exposure index reflects potential exposure to AI technologies rather than actual firm-level AI adoption.
Paper explicit limitation: the AI exposure index measures potential exposure and is not a direct measure of firm-level adoption.
The study uses occupation-level data for 671 occupations combining wage information with an AI exposure index.
Methods description: occupation-level dataset of 671 occupations and an AI exposure index constructed/used by the authors.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to screen and rank job applicants, creating incentives for candidates to strategically manipulate algorithmic hiring systems.
Background claim stated in the paper's abstract, likely supported by literature or observation in full text; not empirically quantified in the abstract.
Code and resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/preetb1199/Prompt_Injection_ACL26
Repository link provided in the paper's abstract.
Prompt injection is defined as subtle self-promotional text that introduces no new qualifications but is designed to influence LLM evaluations.
Definition provided in the paper (abstract).
A systematic review of 34 peer-reviewed studies spanning computer science, organizational psychology, human resource management, and legal scholarship was conducted.
Methodological statement in the paper describing the study design: a systematic review and the explicit count of 34 reviewed studies.
We analyse approximately 550,000 datasets from the Hugging Face Hub.
Empirical analysis reported in the paper of datasets indexed on the Hugging Face Hub; sample size given as ~550,000 datasets.
The study examines regime variations of algorithmic governance across five dimensions covering the European Union, the United States, Latin America, Asia, and Türkiye.
Descriptive/method statement in the paper: normative comparative analysis across specified geopolitical/regime cases.
The study uses microdata from the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS) 2014–2018 combined with city-level indicators of AI diffusion and a cohort-based measure of educational mismatch, estimated with extensive fixed-effects models.
Study design and data description reported in the paper abstract/introduction.
General life satisfaction remains unaffected by AI diffusion.
Auxiliary/sensitivity analyses using life-satisfaction measures available in CLDS; reported null effect of city-level AI diffusion on general life satisfaction.
AI diffusion is not significantly associated with individual wages.
City-level indicators of AI diffusion linked to CLDS microdata; estimated main effects of AI diffusion on individual wages in fixed-effects models found no significant association.
The study used an explanatory quantitative approach with simple random sampling of 385 illustrators from the Artist's Base community and analyzed relationships using simple linear regression.
Study methods statement: sample = 385 illustrators, sampling = simple random sampling within Artist's Base community, analysis = simple linear regression (explanatory quantitative approach).
The argument that automation is leading to a general decline in employment opportunities is not supported by actual facts and trends; rather, it is a product of the pervasive influence of technological fetishism.
Author's evaluative conclusion based on the reviewed theoretical and empirical studies; the excerpt provides no specific datasets or statistical tests supporting this rebuttal.
A conceptual framework is developed showing how digital infrastructure and institutional support mediate sectoral transformation.
Paper presents a conceptual framework (theoretical/modeling component) derived from empirical findings and policy analysis; this is descriptive rather than a quantified empirical result.
Artificial intelligence is taking on advising functions and automating both the production of student work and employer-side candidate screening.
Statement in the essay (perspective/argumentative piece). The claim is supported as a conceptual observation drawing on literature on AI adoption; no empirical sample or quantified measurement reported.
The paper's contribution is theoretical: it reframes the AI productivity debate beyond automation anxiety by linking technological change, income distribution and effective demand in a single analytical framework.
Author-stated contribution and framing in the conceptual review (description of scope and aim).