Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
6Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
No provider ID is stored.
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Shang-Jing Tang (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
- Firm Productivity: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading return notes can cut inspection costs and raise recovery value: a simulation benchmark shows text-extracted condition signals enable targeted inspections that outperform a noisy full-inspection baseline across IT, aircraft MRO and consumer-returns scenarios—while a risk-blind 'never inspect' policy still wins under a narrow economic objective.arxiv | Shang-Jing Tang unresolved |
2026-09-02 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.