Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
0Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
No provider ID is stored.
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Lukas Zumbrunn (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Skill Obsolescence: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Wages: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI can both sharpen and dull corporate strategic foresight depending on how it’s deployed: four distinct collaboration roles—from embedded Ally to disruptive Provoking Catalyst—systematically alter attention, search scope and cognitive friction, so sequencing and governance determine whether firms gain broader, more robust scenarios or fall prey to narrowed frames and overconfidence.openalex | Lukas Zumbrunn unresolved |
2026-09-16 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.