Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
5Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
71461232
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Sahil Bhatnagar (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Productivity: 2 papers
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Organizational Efficiency: 2 papers
- Task Completion Time: 2 papers
- Output Quality: 1 paper
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A read-only, environment-probing curator substantially improves agent memory: on CLBench probe-enabled curation raised pass rate from 39% to 73% and halved task-agent cost (≈$3.38 → $1.68), while reducing redundant tool calls and improving cost-effectiveness across multiple enterprise document worlds.arxiv | Sahil Bhatnagar provider id |
2026-09-10 | 0 |
| Shell-only orchestration outperforms typed tool catalogs in simulated enterprise agent tasks: bash-only agents score substantially higher and use fewer tokens/costs than direct typed-tool interfaces, while programmatic tool calling reduces tokens but usually trails bash in quality; where arbitrary execution is feasible use shell, otherwise prefer catalog-restricted programs for compliance.arxiv | Sahil Bhatnagar provider id |
2026-09-10 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.