Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
1Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2025–2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
97583702
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- A. Vărzaru (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 2 papers
- Governance: 2 papers
- Innovation: 2 papers
- Productivity: 2 papers
- Labor Markets: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Firm Productivity: 2 papers
- Governance And Regulation: 2 papers
- Other: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Employment: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Skill Acquisition: 1 paper
- Social Protection: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU countries that adopt AI more intensively tend to be richer and employ proportionally more science and technology professionals; however, overall employment and sustainability gains are modest and less clear-cut.semantic_scholar | A. Vărzaru provider id |
2026-06-19 | 0 |
| EU countries with stronger AI uptake tend to use materials more productively, but gains on waste reduction and recycling are patchy; AI appears to support circular-economy goals mainly when paired with coherent national strategies and institutions.openalex | A. Vărzaru provider id |
2025-12-17 | 3 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 3 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.