Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
5Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2025–2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2326964585
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Ruijiang Gao (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 2 papers
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Inequality: 1 paper
- Innovation: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Consumer Welfare: 1 paper
- Output Quality: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
- Inequality: 1 paper
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Task Completion Time: 1 paper
- Wages: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A practical audit toolkit for algorithmic pricing: by exploiting exploration randomness and using cumulative propensity weights — plus a doubly robust augmentation — regulators and firms can estimate consumer surplus and quantify profit–equity trade-offs without fully specifying demand.arxiv | Ruijiang Gao provider id |
2026-01-03 | 0 |
| A cryptographic valuation protocol can let buyers measure dataset utility without seeing raw data, and simulations show encrypted scores closely track plaintext utility. The results suggest data value is heavy-tailed—few examples drive model capability—challenging flat-rate compensation in data markets.arxiv | Ruijiang Gao provider id |
2025-12-04 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 1 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.