Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
3Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
1884159
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Enkelejda Kasneci (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI agents rival humans in methodological choices but betray bias at interpretation: LLMs reproduce or exceed human specification diversity on a policy dataset, yet targeted prompts can flip their final verdicts from near-zero to near-complete support while leaving coefficient distributions unchanged.arxiv | Enkelejda Kasneci provider id |
2026-06-09 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.