Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
5Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2516584
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- U. Gadiraju (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 2 papers
- Governance: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
- Skills Training: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Decision Quality: 2 papers
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Other: 1 paper
- Consumer Welfare: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| How researchers pay participants shapes what we learn about human–AI teamwork: inconsistent or misaligned incentives bias measured effort, trust and accuracy, so the authors propose a practical Incentive‑Tuning Framework to calibrate and transparently report pay schemes across studies.semantic_scholar | U. Gadiraju provider id |
Fetched 2026-03-15 | 3 |
| Uncertain leak risks deter consumers from AI personalization: when data-leak probabilities are presented as a range, adoption falls markedly, but a stated 30% risk does not reduce uptake; users willingly overpay for privacy-disclosure labels, signaling high demand for transparent risk information.arxiv | U. Gadiraju provider id |
2026-03-09 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 3 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.