Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
0Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2305453074
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Joshua Harris (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Task Completion Time: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A new professional-grade benchmark finds leading LLMs still fall far short of equity analysts: the best agent matches analysts in just over half of cases and false-positive rates span roughly 1%–32%, revealing important trade-offs among accuracy, cost and reliability.arxiv | Joshua Harris provider id |
2026-07-22 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.