Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
31Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2265391422
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Peter C. Rigby (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 2 papers
- Human Ai Collab: 2 papers
- Productivity: 2 papers
- Org Design: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Organizational Efficiency: 2 papers
- Output Quality: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Developer Productivity: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
- Task Completion Time: 1 paper
- Automation Exposure: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk-stratified automated review absorbed much of Meta’s AI-driven code surge: RADAR landed 331K of 535K+ reviewed changes, cut median time-to-close and review wall time sharply, and recorded far lower revert and production-incident rates than non-automated diffs.arxiv | Peter C. Rigby provider id |
2026-05-28 | 0 |
| More-capable language models produce bloated, tightly coupled code that accrues architectural debt, and code volume reliably predicts this structural decay; functional correctness and detailed prompting do not stop the rot, implying AI-assisted software engineering must add architectural foresight to avoid mounting maintenance costs.arxiv | Peter C. Rigby provider id |
2026-05-04 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 1 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.