Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
9Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
1671375286
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Dan Bateyko (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized 'human uplift' trials remain useful but are routinely compromised by frontier AI's nonstationarity, shifting baselines, diverse and evolving users, and spillovers; experts recommend adaptive designs, continuous post-deployment monitoring, mixed methods, and conservative interpretation rather than reliance on single trials for high‑stakes decisions.arxiv | Dan Bateyko provider id |
2026-03-11 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 1 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.