Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
197Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2263450633
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Brian Tse (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 2 papers
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Inequality: 1 paper
- Labor Markets: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 2 papers
- Consumer Welfare: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
- Market Structure: 1 paper
- Social Protection: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large language models can autonomously breach simulated servers: tested across 300 targets, 19 models show penetration success rates from roughly 11% to nearly 70%, and capability gains track improved attack performance; however, results are based on simplified, controlled environments and may overstate real-world risk.arxiv | Brian Tse provider id |
2026-06-11 | 0 |
| AI experts see multiple pathways to catastrophe within five years: in a Delphi of 272 specialists, 18 of 24 assessed risks had more than a 10% chance of catastrophic outcomes under business‑as‑usual by 2030, and even with pragmatic mitigations five risks retained >10% catastrophe probability, with general‑purpose AI developers and governance actors judged most responsible for mitigation.arxiv | Brian Tse provider id |
2026-06-03 | 2 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 2 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.