Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
9Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2326671900
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Jie M. Zhang (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 2 papers
- Org Design: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Governance And Regulation: 2 papers
- Other: 1 paper
- Skill Obsolescence: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 1 paper
- Automation Exposure: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Task Completion Time: 1 paper
- Training Effectiveness: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A job-task grounded taxonomy finds most workplace AI risks arise from human–agent interaction — incorrect agent actions and gradual skill erosion dominate; augmentation risks worker capability and wellbeing, while automation shifts harms toward operational and financial failures.arxiv | Jie M. Zhang provider id |
2026-08-09 | 0 |
| AI-generated PR descriptions that misrepresent code are rare but costly: 1.7% of agentic PRs showed high inconsistency and were accepted far less often and merged 3.5× more slowly, undermining reviewer trust and slowing collaboration.arxiv | Jie M. Zhang provider id |
2026-01-08 | 5 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 5 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.