Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
6Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2119941451
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Saelyne Yang (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Decision Quality: 1 paper
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Worker Satisfaction: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A new 67.5-hour benchmark finds current multimodal models struggle to infer users' GUI behavior and intent — scoring about 44.6% on behavior-state detection and 55.0% on help prediction — yet supplying structured user context can raise help-prediction accuracy by up to 50.2 percentage points.arxiv | Saelyne Yang provider id |
2026-03-26 | 3 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 3 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.