Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
3Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2386016228
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Victor Rosenbacke (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 2 papers
- Human Ai Collab: 2 papers
- Org Design: 2 papers
- Productivity: 2 papers
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Skills Training: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Governance And Regulation: 2 papers
- Decision Quality: 2 papers
- Other: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Team Performance: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning is better treated as a shared human–AI protocol than an internal model feat; 'The Architect's Pen' prescribes structured human–model dialogues (articulate, critique, revise) to produce auditable, controllable reasoning and facilitate governance without changing underlying models.arxiv | Victor Rosenbacke provider id |
2026-04-16 | 3 |
| Fluent answers from large language models can mask unreliable reasoning; stabilising both human and model processes with uncertainty cues and an Epistemic Control Loop is necessary to make AI trustworthy in high-stakes decision-making.arxiv | Victor Rosenbacke provider id |
2026-04-16 | 3 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 6 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.