0 cumulative citations
View corpus contextIndian SMEs that recognize clear functional and efficiency benefits from AI report stronger innovation capabilities and durable competitive advantage; technical complexity nudges firms to build capabilities rather than blocking benefits, and regulation — if well-targeted — can amplify those gains.
Citation observations
Cumulative provider counts captured on specific dates; providers are never combined.
0 cumulative citations
View corpus contextThis study examines small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in India, one of the world’s largest emerging economies, to understand how artificial intelligence (AI) value perceptions influence innovation capabilities and sustainable competitive advantage. Drawing on the Value Adoption Model (VAM) and Resource-Based View (RBV), the research investigates the role of functional benefits, efficiency gains, technical complexity, and perceived costs in shaping innovation outcomes. Using a mixed-method approach and PLS-SEM analysis on data from SME managers, the findings reveal that functional and efficiency benefits significantly enhance both perceived innovation capabilities (PIC) and sustained competitive advantage (SCA). While technical complexity contributes indirectly through capability development, perceived costs act as strategic investments rather than barriers. Innovation capabilities further mediate these relationships, reinforcing their importance as strategic assets. Regulatory support plays a nuanced moderating role, strengthening or constraining competitive outcomes depending on its intensity. The study contributes to information systems literature by integrating value perception and capability-based perspectives to explain AI-driven competitiveness in emerging economies, although the empirical evidence is derived exclusively from India.
Summary
Main Finding
Perceptions of AI value among Indian SMEs—especially functional benefits and efficiency gains—significantly strengthen perceived innovation capabilities (PIC) and sustained competitive advantage (SCA). Technical complexity influences competitiveness indirectly by driving capability development, while perceived costs are treated more as strategic investments than adoption barriers. Innovation capabilities mediate the effects of AI value perceptions on sustained advantage, and regulatory support moderates outcomes in a context-dependent way.
Key Points
- Theoretical framing: integrates the Value Adoption Model (VAM) with the Resource-Based View (RBV) to link value perceptions to capability formation and competitive outcomes.
- Positive drivers:
- Functional benefits (usefulness) → strong direct positive effects on PIC and SCA.
- Efficiency gains (productivity) → strong direct positive effects on PIC and SCA.
- Complexity and cost:
- Technical complexity does not block outcomes directly but spurs capability development that then affects competitiveness (indirect effect).
- Perceived costs are interpreted by managers as strategic investments rather than straightforward deterrents to AI adoption.
- Mediation and moderation:
- Innovation capabilities mediate the relationship between AI value perceptions and sustained competitive advantage.
- Regulatory support has a nuanced moderating role: appropriate support can strengthen competitive outcomes, while overly burdensome or weak regulation can constrain them.
- Contribution: bridges information-systems value-perception approaches and capability-based views to explain AI-driven competitiveness in emerging-market SMEs.
- Limitation: findings are based solely on data from India, limiting generalizability.
Data & Methods
- Population: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in India; respondents were SME managers.
- Approach: Mixed-methods design (qualitative + quantitative components).
- Quantitative analysis: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test relationships among constructs (functional benefits, efficiency gains, technical complexity, perceived costs, perceived innovation capabilities, sustained competitive advantage) and moderation by regulatory support.
- Empirical inference: Hypothesis testing focused on direct, indirect (mediation), and moderation effects; interpretation grounded in VAM and RBV.
Implications for AI Economics
- For firm strategy and resource allocation:
- Treat AI-related expenditures as strategic investments that build firm-specific capabilities yielding durable returns, rather than as sunk adoption costs.
- Prioritize AI use-cases with clear functional and efficiency benefits to accelerate capability accumulation and competitive advantage.
- Invest in capability development (skills, processes, integration) to convert technical complexity into long-term value.
- For policymakers and regulators:
- Calibrate regulatory support to enable capability building (e.g., standards, training subsidies, experimentation sandboxes) rather than imposing heavy compliance costs that could stifle SME competitiveness.
- Recognize that regulatory intensity matters: well-targeted, enabling regulation can accelerate productive AI diffusion in SMEs; overly strict or absent regulation can both have negative effects.
- For economic modeling of AI diffusion:
- Incorporate heterogeneous firm perceptions and capability dynamics (not just adoption binary) into diffusion and productivity models for emerging economies.
- Model firms’ cost perceptions as investment decisions with option-value considerations and long-run capability returns, rather than as immediate adoption thresholds.
- For generalizability and future research:
- Extend empirical testing beyond India to assess cross-country variation in how value perceptions, capability formation, and regulation interact.
- Quantify longer-term productivity and market-structure impacts of AI-driven capability accumulation among SMEs.
Assessment
Claims (7)
| Claim | Direction | Outcome | Confidence & Evidence | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived functional benefits of AI have significant positive direct effects on SMEs' perceived innovation capabilities and sustained competitive advantage. Firm Productivity | positive | Perceived innovation capabilities and sustained competitive advantage |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Perceived AI efficiency gains have significant positive direct effects on SMEs' perceived innovation capabilities and sustained competitive advantage. Firm Productivity | positive | Perceived innovation capabilities and sustained competitive advantage |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Technical complexity does not directly block competitiveness; instead, it contributes indirectly by stimulating innovation capability development, which then affects sustained competitive advantage. Task Allocation | mixed | Innovation capability development and sustained competitive advantage |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Perceived AI-related costs are interpreted by SME managers as strategic investments rather than straightforward barriers to AI adoption. Adoption Rate | positive | Interpretation of AI costs and their role in adoption decisions |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
low
|
not reported
|
| Innovation capabilities mediate the relationship between AI value perceptions and sustained competitive advantage among Indian SMEs. Firm Productivity | positive | Sustained competitive advantage through perceived innovation capabilities |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Regulatory support moderates the relationship between AI-related value perceptions, capability development, and competitive outcomes, with enabling support strengthening outcomes while overly burdensome or weak regulation can constrain them. Governance And Regulation | mixed | Competitive outcomes and capability development under different regulatory conditions |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The study's empirical findings are based solely on Indian SMEs, limiting their generalizability to other national contexts. Other | negative | External validity and cross-country generalizability |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
high
|
not reported
|