The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests References Docs 🎲 Workforce Futures
← Papers
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

Corporate audio, images and video remain an untapped source of economic information for accounting research; integrating multimodal AI with financial text and numbers could improve measurement, detect misreporting and change how markets process disclosures, but doing so requires careful causal methods, benchmarks, and regulatory safeguards.

Multi-modal information in accounting research: how can we use it?☆
Ruiyao Zhang, Can Chen, Minghai Wei, Hao Zhang · August 11, 2026 · China Journal of Accounting Studies
openalex review_meta n/a evidence 7/10 relevance Summary only summary available; pdf_status=paywall DOI Source PDF

Structured author observations

Linked only from stored provider relations; the raw author line above is never matched by name.

OpenAlex

Latest observation:

  1. Ruiyao Zhang provider ID
  2. Can Chen provider ID
  3. Minghai Wei provider ID
  4. Hao Zhang provider ID
The paper argues that multimodal corporate data (images, audio, video and their interactions with text/numbers) are underused in accounting research and outlines methods, challenges, and an agenda to use multimodal fusion to improve measurement, verification, and disclosure effectiveness.

Citation observations

Cumulative provider counts captured on specific dates; providers are never combined.

Multi-modal information is more accessible than ever before. Current research focuses mainly on numerical and textual data, but neglects to an extent data in other modes (i.e. visual, audio, and video) as well as their interactions with each other. The availability of artificial intelligence and multimodal data provides accounting researchers with both opportunities and challenges in collecting, analysing and interpreting the multi-modal financial information. In this paper, we survey the current state of accounting research on non-numerical information and its interaction with numerical information. Based on theoretical and technical foundation, we propose an agenda to explore the three main roles of multi-modal information fusion in accounting research: information completeness, verification and effectiveness.

Summary

Main Finding

Multimodal (visual, audio, video, and their interactions with text and numbers) financial information is substantially underutilized in accounting research. The paper surveys existing work, outlines theoretical and technical foundations, and proposes a research agenda centered on three roles for multimodal information fusion in accounting: improving information completeness, enabling verification, and enhancing effectiveness of disclosures and analyses.

Key Points

  • Current focus: Accounting and finance research predominantly uses numerical and textual data; visual, audio, video modalities and cross-modal interactions are comparatively neglected.
  • Opportunity: Increasing availability of multimodal data (e.g., earnings-call audio, presentation slides, product images, CEO videos, social media posts) and advances in AI (multimodal representation learning, transformers) enable richer analyses of corporate signals.
  • Three proposed roles for multimodal fusion:
    • Information completeness — combining modalities fills gaps in what single modes convey (e.g., images or video reveal product quality or production scale not captured in numbers).
    • Verification — cross-checking information across modalities helps detect misreporting, inconsistencies, or fraud (e.g., mismatch between corporate claims and visual evidence).
    • Effectiveness — multimodal presentation affects how information is perceived and acted upon by investors and stakeholders (e.g., tone in audio/video influences market reactions beyond textual content).
  • Technical foundations: multimodal fusion strategies (early/intermediate/late), pretraining and transfer learning, alignment and synchronization of signals, handling missing/noisy modalities, and interpretability methods.
  • Challenges and risks: data collection/labeling, privacy and proprietary constraints, heterogeneity of modalities, measurement error, causal identification, model explainability, regulatory implications, and potential for adversarial manipulation or bias amplification.

Data & Methods

  • Typical data sources:
    • Corporate disclosures: annual reports, MD&A (text + images), slides, management presentations, video/webcast recordings, earnings-call transcripts and audio.
    • External signals: product images, satellite imagery, store-front photos, social media posts, analyst presentations, job postings, press coverage.
    • Audit and compliance artifacts where available.
  • Methods surveyed / recommended:
    • Representation learning: multimodal embeddings, contrastive learning, joint and cross-modal encoders.
    • Fusion strategies: early (concatenate features), intermediate (cross-attention), late (ensemble predictions); model choice depends on alignment and task.
    • Specialized models: vision-language models (VLMs), speech-to-text + prosody analysis, multimodal transformers, video understanding networks.
    • Classical + causal methods: difference-in-differences, event studies, instrumental variables, and experiments to establish causal mechanisms (e.g., how multimodal cues affect investor behavior).
    • Robustness and interpretability: saliency/attention visualization, counterfactual explanations, human-in-the-loop validation.
    • Practical considerations: handling missing modalities, synchronizing time-series multimodal streams, annotation protocols, privacy-preserving techniques.
  • Evaluation:
    • Task-specific metrics (classification accuracy, AUC, forecasting error) and economic metrics (abnormal returns, trading volume, cost of capital, audit outcomes).
    • Benchmark datasets and reproducibility practices are emphasized as needed.

Implications for AI Economics

  • Measurement and information environment:
    • Multimodal signals can improve measurement of firm fundamentals and soft information, reducing measurement error and enabling richer tests of asset pricing and information asymmetry theories.
    • Better proxies for unobserved firm activities (e.g., production scale via imagery) can refine empirical estimates of productivity, investment, and risk.
  • Market efficiency and asset pricing:
    • Adding multimodal cues may alter how quickly and accurately markets incorporate information; models that exploit multimodal data could generate predictability that challenges semi-strong efficiency tests.
    • Incorporating multimodal features into risk models and event studies could change inferred risk premia and cross-sectional return patterns.
  • Corporate behavior and disclosure strategy:
    • Firms may strategically deploy multimodal content (visuals, tone) to influence investor perceptions; regulators and researchers should study detectability and materiality of such strategies.
    • Multimodal audit and verification tools could improve audit quality and fraud detection, but also raise questions about standards and liability.
  • Policy, regulation, and ethics:
    • Use of multimodal AI raises privacy, consent, and manipulation concerns (e.g., deepfakes); regulators must consider guidelines for disclosure formats and verification.
    • Standardization of multimodal reporting and data-sharing practices would facilitate research and market transparency.
  • Labor and market structure:
    • Demand for new skills (multimodal analytics) in accounting and finance professions will grow; adoption may change the role of human analysts toward oversight and interpretation.
  • Research agenda recommendations:
    • Build benchmark multimodal datasets with clear provenance, labeling, and privacy safeguards.
    • Combine causal identification strategies with multimodal ML to move beyond prediction to explanation.
    • Invest in interpretability and robustness checks to ensure economic validity and guard against manipulation.
    • Foster interdisciplinary collaboration (accounting, computer vision, NLP, econometrics, regulation) and open reproducible code/data to accelerate progress.

Short takeaway: Multimodal AI offers substantial potential to improve accounting measurement, verification, and the study of information effects in markets, but realizing this potential requires careful methodological, causal, ethical, and regulatory work.

Assessment

Paper Typereview_meta Evidence Strengthn/a — This is a survey and research-agenda paper that synthesizes existing work and proposes directions rather than presenting new causal or empirical identification; therefore it does not provide direct causal evidence. Methods Rigorn/a — The paper documents methods and recommends rigorous approaches (ML architectures, causal designs, robustness checks) but does not itself implement or evaluate those methods empirically; rigor of recommended methods is reasonable but untested within the paper. SampleNot an empirical sample: a literature survey and conceptual synthesis drawing on typical multimodal data sources used or available to accounting researchers (corporate disclosures: annual reports, MD&A, slides, earnings-call transcripts and audio, webcast videos; external signals: product images, satellite imagery, store-front photos, social media, analyst materials; audit/compliance artifacts where accessible). Themesproductivity adoption governance GeneralizabilityConceptual: recommendations apply broadly but must be adapted to industry, country, and firm-size differences in data availability and disclosure practices, Data availability and quality vary across firms, sectors, and jurisdictions, limiting empirical application, Privacy, proprietary, and legal constraints may prevent construction of comprehensive multimodal datasets, Heterogeneity of modalities and measurement error reduce transferability of specific models across contexts, Many proposed benefits are speculative until validated with causal/empirical studies

Claims (10)

ClaimDirectionOutcomeConfidence & EvidenceDetails
Accounting and finance research predominantly uses numerical and textual data, while visual, audio, video, and cross-modal information are comparatively neglected. Research Productivity negative Relative use of different data modalities in accounting and finance research
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
not reported
0.24
Combining multiple information modalities can improve the completeness of information available for accounting and financial analysis by revealing signals that are not captured in numerical or textual data alone. Decision Quality positive Completeness and measurement of firm information
Reading fidelity high
Study strength low
not reported
0.12
Cross-modal verification can help detect misreporting, inconsistencies, or fraud by identifying mismatches between corporate claims and evidence in other modalities. Regulatory Compliance positive Detection of misreporting, inconsistencies, and fraud
Reading fidelity high
Study strength low
not reported
0.12
Multimodal presentation features, including tone in audio or video, may influence investor and stakeholder responses beyond the information contained in text. Decision Quality positive Investor and stakeholder reactions to corporate disclosures
Reading fidelity high
Study strength low
not reported
0.12
Multimodal signals can provide better proxies for otherwise unobserved firm activities, such as production scale inferred from imagery, potentially improving estimates of productivity, investment, and risk. Firm Productivity positive Measurement of firm fundamentals, productivity, investment, and risk
Reading fidelity high
Study strength speculative
not reported
0.04
Using multimodal data in financial models may change the speed and accuracy with which markets incorporate information and may generate return predictability relevant to tests of semi-strong market efficiency. Market Structure mixed Market information incorporation and return predictability
Reading fidelity high
Study strength speculative
not reported
0.04
Firms may strategically deploy multimodal content, including visual presentation and vocal tone, to influence investor perceptions. Decision Quality mixed Strategic influence of disclosure presentation on investor perceptions
Reading fidelity high
Study strength speculative
not reported
0.04
Multimodal audit and verification tools have the potential to improve audit quality and fraud detection, but their use raises questions about standards and liability. Regulatory Compliance mixed Audit quality and fraud detection
Reading fidelity high
Study strength speculative
not reported
0.04
Adoption of multimodal AI is expected to increase demand for multimodal analytics skills in accounting and finance and may shift human analysts toward oversight and interpretation. Skill Acquisition positive Demand for multimodal analytics skills and changes in analyst roles
Reading fidelity high
Study strength speculative
not reported
0.04
Causal identification, interpretability, robustness checks, privacy safeguards, and defenses against adversarial manipulation are necessary for multimodal accounting research to produce economically valid findings. Ai Safety And Ethics mixed Reliability and validity of multimodal accounting analyses
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
not reported
0.24

Notes