STARA technologies are remapping careers: they can boost learning and productivity while also driving displacement, identity threat and opaque algorithmic gatekeeping; however, evidence is fragmented, skewed toward certain occupations, and needs more long‑term, sector‑specific study.
Significant advancements in smart technology, AI, robotics and algorithms (STARA) are changing how organisations design and implement work for the current and future workforce. Understanding the implications of STARA on work attitudes and behaviours is gaining the attention of scholars and practitioners (e.g. Brougham and Haar, 2018; Raisch and Krakowski, 2021; Tang et al., 2023; Ulfert et al., 2024; Yam et al., 2023), with existing findings highlighting the varied and significant effects that different types of new technologies can exert on people’s performance and wellbeing (e.g. Bankins et al., 2024b). New technologies have the potential to be disruptive in diverse ways, thereby shaping working roles, organisational contexts and people’s working lives and careers (e.g. Selenko et al., 2022). Most existing reviews on STARA’s role in organisational behaviour and personnel management (cf. Bankins et al., 2024b; Köchling and Wehner, 2020) focus on changes to work tasks and organisational systems, while also highlighting the essential role humans play in adopting new technologies. So far, less attention has been paid to how these technological innovations are shaping workers’ careers in both standard (e.g. employment) and non-standard (e.g. the platform economy) work settings. Careers “involve a sequence (or sequences) of work experiences over time … (forming) a complex mosaic of objective experiences and subjective evaluations, resulting in an enormous diversity in terms of how careers can take shape” (De Vos et al., 2020, p. 1). There is already some evidence of how STARA will shape people’s career paths, plans, decision-making and perceptions of employability across career stages (Bankins et al., 2024a). However, more contextualised assessments are needed, as existing research rarely differentiates between occupational groups or types of employment.Previous studies examining STARA’s role in career decision-making (Gati and Kulcsar, 2021; Bartosiak and Modlinski, 2022) underscore the importance of understanding STARA's holistic impact when exploring its influence on careers. Addressing this requires a dual focus: on the one hand, acknowledging the diversity of technologies that comprise STARA and their distinct effects on work and job design; on the other, examining their shared and cumulative influence across the broader spectrum of career-related choices, decisions and experiences.This Special Issue focuses on research investigating the effects of STARA in the context of careers, with attention to multilevel perspectives (Bankins et al., 2024a, b), encompassing both standard and non-standard forms of work and the broad spectrum of technologies that fall under the STARA umbrella (Tang et al., 2022). Together, the contributions advance understanding of how workers and organisations can leverage these transformative technologies to support, rather than hinder, career development – an especially important endeavour given that the future of work and how careers are developed, managed and experienced depend on understanding how technology is integrated into the workplace.To provide a coherent framework for this exploration, this editorial highlights four central research areas. We begin with core career themes (i.e. career transitions, development and success), which capture the principal outcomes and processes influenced by STARA. Next, we consider career stages, recognising that impacts and responses differ across entry, mid-career and later stages. Third, we examine contextual variations across sectors and across standard and non-standard forms of employment, emphasising that similar technologies may produce different career effects in different settings. Fourth, we highlight emerging topics that warrant renewed scholarly attention. Finally, we discuss the individual contributions in this special issue and consider how each advances knowledge on these thematic dimensions.Research on career transitions in the context of STARA has primarily emphasised the displacement of routine tasks and potentially roles, particularly in occupations where automation and robotics can substitute standardised work processes (Bahadure et al., 2024; Oosthuizen, 2019, 2022; Singh and Chandra, 2026; Singh et al., 2026). This has been accompanied by an emerging body of work highlighting the need to upskill and reskill workers in the face of organisational STARA adoption. Even in high-skilled jobs, workers are expected to adapt to technology-driven changes and integrate new digital competencies into their professional trajectories (Hani et al., 2025; Ibrahim and Abiddin, 2024; Singh and Chandra, 2026; Singh et al., 2026; Tariq, 2026).However, one crucial and relatively poorly understood aspect of technology-induced career transitions is their degree of threat or voluntariness. Some transitions may be involuntary, such as job loss due to automation. In contrast, others are voluntary, such as moving into technology-intensive roles or professions out of personal interest or choice. The extent to which individuals “own” these transitions is likely to shape how meaningful the experience is perceived, how readily they can identify with their new roles and how they adjust psychologically (Bankins and Formosa, 2023; Selenko et al., 2022). Research on occupational groups that have long navigated technological disruption – for example, radiographers, radiologists (Stogiannos et al., 2025; Perez et al., 2024) and librarians (Nelson and Irwin, 2014) – can provide valuable insights into these processes.Moreover, while research has primarily centred on high-skill contexts, less attention has been directed toward low- and medium-skill occupations, where STARA may also fragment or expand existing roles and limit, expand, or generate new career paths. These dynamics could pose unique challenges for workers navigating transitions without established trajectories, weak opportunities to voice concerns, or the necessary institutional support structures to buffer change, thereby potentially widening inequalities across occupational groups and particular cohorts of workers (Zajko, 2022).Career development in the age of STARA highlights the expanding use of digital learning platforms and AI-based training tools as central mechanisms for supporting continuous skill acquisition and professional growth. In parallel, there is a growing recognition of self-managed, technology-supported approaches to career development, where individuals proactively engage with digital resources to source career advice, enhance their employability and navigate dynamic labour markets (Bankins et al., 2024a). For example, Yuan et al. (2026; in this special issue) demonstrate that AI usage at work can simultaneously enhance thriving as well as induce identity threat, with employees’ learning and performance goal orientations driving career growth. This highlights the simultaneous brighter and darker sides of AI usage, and the complex psychological processes through which technology influences professional development.At the same time, important questions continue to challenge and potentially expand our understanding. One key issue is whether STARA-enabled development resources contribute to democratising access to opportunities or inadvertently reinforce existing inequalities by being more accessible to some workers than others (Özbilgin et al., 2025). Career advice and guidance that support career development may become more readily available via technology, but human advisors will still be needed, particularly for unique and complex cases (Bankins et al., 2024a). Another underexplored area is the long-term impact of algorithm-driven systems, such as AI-based career planning platforms and digital portfolio and performance trackers. These tools can influence career trajectories in multiple ways: for instance, they may provide on-demand, personalised feedback, suggest potential skill development pathways, or facilitate the management of digital career portfolios. At the same time, such systems may have limitations and unintended consequences. They can embed biases, amplify pressures for self-optimisation, provide only generic recommendations rather than tailored guidance and risk promoting a narrow view of what constitutes a “desirable” career – raising the question of whether optimal career trajectories can be defined or adequately captured by available data.Research on career success in the context of STARA has increasingly focused on the use of algorithmic systems for productivity and performance monitoring (Giermindl et al., 2022; McCartney and Fu, 2022), highlighting both efficiencies and new pressures in technology-mediated work environments (Yang, 2022). Concurrently, attention has grown around the importance of well-being and work–life balance, as organisations and employees navigate the psychological and social implications of technologically enhanced performance tracking (Norlander et al., 2021), which can include the tracking of employees’ emotional and physiological responses at work and during their non-work time using sensors and other algorithmically enhanced data collection systems (Downie et al., 2025; Weston, 2015).Understanding how STARA reshapes the determinants and perceptions of career success requires further investigation. One underexplored area is the role of algorithmic gatekeeping in career advancement, including opaque promotion processes and AI-filtered evaluations that may privilege certain behaviours or skill sets while limiting transparency and equity (Hillebrand et al., 2025). Metrics of career success – both objective (e.g. income, status) and subjective (e.g. meaningful work, recognition, career satisfaction) – are evolving in the context of changing work environments (Spurk et al., 2019; Shockley et al., 2016). However, when promotion and reward systems rely heavily on algorithmic assessments, such indicators of success risk being overshadowed by easily quantifiable productivity metrics, potentially marginalising less tangible but still meaningful dimensions of professional achievement. This also raises questions about how AI-based evaluation tools shape perceptions of performance and career success and how these technologies may redefine which skills, behaviours, or outcomes are recognised and rewarded in the workplace.Moreover, in non-traditional labour market contexts, such as the platform economy, performance and career success are increasingly captured through alternative, often real-time metrics, highlighting a growing divergence from traditional indicators and raising questions about how conventional and non-traditional measures can be integrated to fully understand career outcomes. This raises additional questions about how new forms of work – such as hybrid, gig-based, digital nomadism, or AI-enhanced – are redefining what it means to be successful in a career (Reichenberger, 2017).Super’s (1957) work decomposes the career span into stages that reflect three broad periods across the life course (noting that we do not focus on the growth stage): exploration and establishment, where workers crystallise a career preference, undertake training to achieve it and begin stabilising their careers; maintenance, where workers largely consolidate their achievements, but with openness to new challenges and ongoing upskilling; and disengagement, where workers move toward transitioning out of the workforce (Greenhaus and Callanan, 2006). Super’s model is age-agnostic, allowing workers to cycle through different stages regardless of their life stage. STARA technologies are influencing careers across each of these stages (Bankins et al., 2024a).In entry-level careers, STARA technologies are increasingly recognised as offering both barriers and accelerators. In terms of barriers, there are growing concerns that entry-level positions, including in high-skill occupations, may be or by STARA et al., 2025; and thereby traditional for from to more roles and the opportunities for to the that In terms of STARA technologies can enhance entry-level workers’ productivity et al., existing career trajectories, may also generate new et al., 2020) by the importance of some skills, training and over to new of work experiences and careers. may well be that such digital AI and with robotics or algorithmic systems, may access to career such as more complex work, shaping the of professional trajectories (Bankins et al., et al., important The long-term effects of and how career experiences of using these technologies impact professional identity and development are not well understood et al., 2022), raising questions about how technology-mediated influence career attitudes and growth trajectories the of STARA tools may be traditional and potentially opportunities for learning and personalised guidance for the to fully routine or tasks to AI may learning opportunities for their skill development and into the workforce Finally, the of AI and other automation technologies may not only the of entry-level available to high-skill but also their potentially redefining what professional work and the of that are et al., 2025; et al., mid-career research has largely emphasised and as for navigating digital with a particular focus on learning platforms and work to facilitate career and skill (Bankins et al., 2025). These are often as mechanisms to employability and adapt to evolving technological these key further One is the potential for career or from role or which may the of work and opportunities for skill and technology can also for career by and employees to engage in more and meaningful However, more diverse evidence on such outcomes across sectors is there is understanding of the extent to which organisations in and across career stages, or whether they focus on raising questions about access to development resources and long-term to mid-career stages also from STARA often and of working and that workers may to STARA is as important of work or to identity threat perceptions may be organisational to upskill workers to et al., on workers in the context of STARA has primarily digital skill and the risk of from the labour as well as to professional and in the face of technology et al., 2023; Bankins et al., and However, emerging evidence that age and experience can support more use of AI by the technology to knowledge and such as through and et al., 2025). workers a valuable as knowledge and of AI and systems, to organisational during technological to STARA not be as a it may also reflect by feedback, or perspectives that shape more and technology (Bankins and Formosa, of available STARA technologies means their diverse Some such as have been navigating technological changes the professions such as radiologists and in and in and have been occupational for workers have also experienced technological over time that have the and of and other These workers are also AI as a potential to and other et al., but also as a potential for their often examine how technological reshapes and occupational a understanding of will continue to be both (i.e. and (i.e. unique in how different occupations experience changes by this new of STARA which warrant in their For example, in terms of of transitions of technological in these sectors are limiting our to of labour In terms of in the career and in AI-enhanced significant as it is often how and be between human and algorithmic systems 2025; et al., et al., 2025). The of and AI is of work and its for a of what constitutes skill and professional in these evolving contexts et al., non-standard types of work, particularly the platform economy, research has of and algorithmic highlighting how digital management systems performance evaluation and work and 2025; and in have also such as in work et al., 2024; et al., in this special issue) and the implications for career development in these but often work et al., area of from exploring time for the outcomes of this of For example, long-term career and the of or digital careers are not well raising questions about how these workers navigate professional growth over time in environments and 2025; et al., STARA technologies may contribute to career by limiting opportunities and traditional growth et al., these same technologies could with career for example, barriers with evidence on such outcomes of AI-based career and digital platforms has become a central focus in research on career support 2025; et al., These tools personalised advice and support to workers navigate complex career expanding access to career via technology is an important it raises questions about the and extent of human into these and whether access via STARA technologies may or enhance the and of career For example, the experience of technology-mediated and is not well raising concerns about whether AI can or the guidance by human and et al., 2022). STARA systems in career management on the one hand, be less than a human with less and of their the other hand, these systems can also as their decision-making on existing which may be algorithmic advice may biases, and or non-standard career that are in available potentially limiting its and (Bankins et al., 2024a). the digital platforms could to career guidance and its widening access to career development resources and to engage with professional career work is to understand the and of and forms of career and to toward access to concerns tools or encompassing biases, transparency and in decision-making that can be by STARA technologies. of and and performance tracking have each of and experiences of and 2022), there a need for a understanding of how STARA systems influence meaningful work (Bankins and Formosa, and access to career opportunities across stages and include the implications of human decision-making systems that can impact career outcomes – such as or – and that these systems do not reflect or that may reinforce existing labour market Addressing these concerns requires approaches that not only important but also identify organisational approaches and that technology-mediated career systems are both and on in the age of STARA has largely emphasised occupational and career and 2025; and in et al., 2023; et al., 2022). to employees’ that their occupations and employees’ that the tasks their occupations due to automation et al., In by and technological job occupational and career and 2025; and in et al., 2022), concerns are gaining algorithmic management and automation are with more and varied forms of work, such as in the platform economy, which are to of and for such workers and 2025; and in For instance, et al. in this special issue) demonstrate that career in work, such as the of in the workers toward career with core engage in career (e.g. career and highlighting how personal and contextual shape to et al. in this special issue) also responses to a through these we highlight for future between job and career further as each may have different implications for and long-term development et al., is also important to understand how the extent of STARA understanding and experience with these technologies to such the psychological impacts of to evolving technologies – such as and – are not well Finally, while STARA it also opportunities for new jobs, roles and highlighting the potential for career and in changing labour on the future of work has increasingly emphasised the importance of such as and emotional highlighting their for navigating (Bankins et al., Oosthuizen, 2022; et al., These competencies are often as essential for employability in a labour these insights are what new forms of work, and career will in to technological is often more For example, a key concerns the of new and professions emerging from STARA as well as the through which these opportunities important is understanding how workers engage in job the design of their roles to with technological and evolving organisational For example, et al. demonstrate that employees opportunities personal knowledge management This to and thereby their competencies and their career trajectories technological changes in the job is about career and 2020) how individuals shape their career trajectories in occupations to on emerging opportunities and professional over time, or whether they STARA in their at and 2021), particularly in where the impact be more or less could be by such as perceptions of their future work and the to with STARA technologies at work and diverse and this Special Issue how STARA technologies are careers across contexts and skill Yuan et al. that AI usage simultaneously thriving and identity highlighting the complex psychological that influence career growth. et al. how a can be in the context of work, to both and implications for people’s development in this of et al. that AI opportunities employees to knowledge management skills, supporting in evolving et al. this to emphasising career as a key for emerging technologies. At the same time, et al. highlight the of work, how career responses on and core Finally, et al. these highlighting how and work play an important role in access to career The a of each highlighting how these studies enhance our understanding of STARA’s impact on careers, from individual psychological processes to and contextual et al. examine how the use of at work influences career growth through dual on a of employees across the demonstrate that AI usage simultaneously thriving at work and an identity career while identity threat employees to a to learning goal the between thriving and career growth. In contrast, performance goal the of identity threat but the between thriving and career growth. This framework advances understanding of how AI can support career development while highlighting the complex psychological processes employees navigate in technology-intensive work et al. focus on the STARA-enabled context of They how a can generate both and for the four of a and working a of workers through labour The that the than the job similar between the work challenges and platform also in the over the that platform environments can of a the work context with research on out a the on experiences of technology-mediated research by et al. how employees navigate opportunities and challenges to and their careers in that technology and AI in their to AI opportunities the development of personal knowledge to and This to enhance their professional competencies and concerns about and other forms of career-related thereby employees on a career They can adapt to the of dynamic and complex work by technologies. The findings of this research an of how employees can adapt to the of STARA in the et al. how employees to challenges when with the of in their They employees working in and an by with their their experienced changes to their job tasks and and how that their learning and They that how workers changes on what they their personal and more These on time and The that to not only a skill but also a have to of job how they work and redefine their The for is that technological training and are not to workers with support for is also research by et al. into the of careers in They how career by disruptive and can career and The of an platform in the out of the they in career or career on their on the and their core on the platform experienced it as a career which career core experienced it as a career which career These the processes that how workers to career et al. the new of AI use and AI in to work and using a of employees across a broad of sectors and the that a use of AI to a more AI and a AI They also that in more in work more likely to more use and in their AI use as more the also a of people’s workers or they less use and less in their AI to these findings for on a they do with established research on the effects of social we that AI more use and AI contribute to career this a in positions, more and in already more are likely to in their careers with AI over the The question this raises is how we can not from to and adapt their with the of Special Issue highlights how STARA technologies are career transitions, career development and career while also exploring additional emerging topics in the The contributions demonstrate that STARA can enhance skill development, thriving environments and they also identity and complex and contextual from to work and further shape career there to particularly long-term career trajectories, whether labour market inequalities or and the implications of and career approaches (e.g. in labour platform will be crucial to both design and as well as the emotional and contextual dimensions with technology while also diverse and non-standard career paths. studies that and approaches to career development and integrate organisational and broader labour market perspectives will provide insights to support and meaningful career
Summary
Main Finding
Advances in smart technology, AI, robotics and algorithms (STARA) are reshaping careers across transitions, development and success. STARA has a dual character: it can accelerate skill development, productivity and access to career resources, yet it can also displace tasks/roles, create identity and threat perceptions, amplify surveillance and algorithmic gatekeeping, and widen inequalities. Effects vary strongly by occupational group, career stage, employment form (standard vs non‑standard/platform work) and by whether technological change is voluntary or imposed.
Key Points
- Core themes: STARA affects three central career outcomes — transitions (e.g., displacement, retraining), development (learning, career planning), and success (promotion, wellbeing, perceived meaningfulness).
- Voluntariness matters: whether a technology‑driven transition is experienced as chosen or imposed influences identification with new roles, psychological adjustment and long‑term outcomes.
- Heterogeneous impacts by skill and sector:
- High‑skill occupations face upskilling and identity challenges as technologies augment or substitute tasks.
- Low‑ and medium‑skill occupations risk role fragmentation, fewer clear career trajectories and weaker institutional buffering — increasing inequality risk.
- Occupation‑specific histories of technological change (e.g., radiology, librarianship) provide useful comparative insights.
- Career stages: STARA influences entry, mid‑career and later stages differently (e.g., entry roles may be automated or enriched; mid‑career workers confront reskilling demands; later stages face re‑entry or disengagement decisions).
- Dual effects on development:
- Digital learning platforms and AI training can democratize learning and personalize guidance.
- But algorithmic tools risk embedding bias, promoting narrow definitions of desirable careers, amplifying self‑optimization pressures, and substituting inadequate automated guidance for nuanced human advice.
- Algorithmic management and performance tracking:
- Productivity monitoring and real‑time metrics change incentive structures and what counts as career success.
- Opaque algorithmic gatekeeping can undermine transparency, fairness and recognition of less quantifiable skills.
- Platform and non‑standard work: Platform metrics create distinct career measures and trajectories that diverge from traditional indicators; long‑term career dynamics in these contexts are understudied.
- Psychological mechanisms: Examples from the special issue show AI use can both increase thriving and trigger identity threat; individual goal orientations and personal knowledge management mediate these effects.
- Emerging topics: long‑run effects of AI career tools, interaction of algorithmic systems with human HR decisions, how STARA changes professional identity over time, and whether technology widens or narrows access to career opportunities.
Data & Methods
- Nature of this piece: an editorial review that synthesizes prior theoretical and empirical literature and frames contributions in a Special Issue.
- Methods used across the surveyed and included studies (varied across papers in the literature and the Special Issue):
- Multilevel and multidisciplinary approaches combining organisational, occupational and labour‑market perspectives.
- Empirical designs include qualitative case studies/interviews, cross‑sectional and longitudinal surveys, field studies, and analyses of platform/administrative data.
- Experimental and quasi‑experimental designs appear in some lines of work to identify causal effects of technology on behaviours and outcomes.
- The Special Issue includes empirical papers probing psychological mediators (e.g., identity threat, goal orientation) and contextual moderators (occupation, employment form).
- Limitations noted: many existing studies do not disaggregate sufficiently by occupation or employment form; long‑term longitudinal evidence remains sparse; access to proprietary platform/algorithmic data constrains external validity.
Implications for AI Economics
- Labor supply and human capital:
- STARA changes returns to different skills (technical, emotional, knowledge‑management), altering human capital investment incentives and potentially shifting wage structures and skill premia.
- Economic models should incorporate voluntary vs involuntary transitions and the psychological costs of forced reallocation.
- Job polarization and inequality:
- Potential widening of inequalities across occupations and cohorts if access to reskilling and high‑quality digital career resources is uneven.
- Policy needs to target low‑ and medium‑skill workers and non‑standard workers to avoid exacerbating inequality.
- Measurement and modeling:
- Traditional metrics of career success (income, status) may miss algorithmic, real‑time indicators used in platform and AI‑mediated contexts. Empirical work should integrate platform metrics with conventional labour statistics.
- Models should allow for algorithmic gatekeeping (opaque promotion/filtering rules) as an additional friction or rent‑extracting mechanism affecting career paths.
- Firm behaviour and market design:
- Firms’ adoption of STARA is shaped by human uptake, identity effects and productivity‑wellbeing trade‑offs; models of technology adoption should include behavioural responses.
- Market for career services will change: digital career tools can expand access but may introduce bias and concentration (platform effects). Competition, transparency and standards for algorithmic guidance matter.
- Regulation and institutions:
- Need for transparency, auditing and governance of AI career tools and performance systems to protect fairness, privacy and labour rights.
- Labour market institutions (training programs, unemployment insurance, collective bargaining) should adapt to manage technology‑driven transitions.
- Research priorities for AI economics:
- Causal micro‑evidence linking exposure to STARA (firm‑level or task‑level) with wages, promotions, job transitions and long‑run career trajectories.
- Heterogeneity analysis by occupation, skill level, age and employment form (platform vs standard).
- Studies combining administrative/platform data with surveys to capture both objective metrics and subjective career outcomes (identity, meaningfulness).
- Evaluation of reskilling and career‑support interventions (RCTs/quasi‑experiments), and assessment of regulation (transparency, algorithm audits) on labor markets.
- Policy takeaways:
- Invest in accessible, high‑quality reskilling and lifelong learning that combine digital tools with human advisory support.
- Ensure transparency and auditability of algorithmic evaluation and gatekeeping systems.
- Design social and institutional supports targeted at workers in occupations and employment forms most exposed to adverse STARA effects (platform workers, low/medium‑skill groups).
Assessment
Claims (11)
| Claim | Direction | Confidence | Outcome | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significant advancements in smart technology, AI, robotics and algorithms (STARA) are changing how organisations design and implement work for the current and future workforce. Organizational Efficiency | mixed | high | how organisations design and implement work (work design / organisational practices) |
0.24
|
| STARA is displacing routine tasks and potentially entire roles, particularly in occupations where automation and robotics can substitute standardized work processes. Job Displacement | negative | high | displacement of routine tasks/roles (job loss/substitution) |
0.24
|
| Adoption of STARA increases the need to upskill and reskill workers across skill levels, with even high-skilled workers expected to integrate new digital competencies into their professional trajectories. Skill Acquisition | positive | high | demand for upskilling/reskilling and digital competency acquisition |
0.24
|
| AI usage at work can simultaneously enhance employees' thriving and induce identity threat; employees’ learning and performance goal orientations drive career growth in this context (Yuan et al., 2026, in this special issue). Skill Acquisition | mixed | high | employee thriving, identity threat, and career growth |
0.24
|
| Digital learning platforms and AI-based training tools are increasingly used as central mechanisms to support continuous skill acquisition and professional growth. Skill Acquisition | positive | high | use of digital learning/AI training tools to support skill acquisition and professional growth |
0.24
|
| Algorithmic systems for productivity and performance monitoring generate efficiencies but also create new pressures in technology-mediated work environments, including the tracking of employees’ emotional and physiological responses at work and during non-work time. Worker Satisfaction | mixed | high | productivity monitoring effects; employee pressures and well-being implications |
0.24
|
| Algorithmic gatekeeping in promotion and evaluation processes can privilege certain behaviours or skill sets while limiting transparency and equity in career advancement. Inequality | negative | high | transparency, equity, and fairness in promotion/evaluation (career advancement) |
0.24
|
| AI-based career planning platforms and digital portfolio/performance trackers can embed biases, amplify pressures for self-optimisation, provide only generic recommendations, and risk promoting a narrow view of what constitutes a desirable career. Skill Obsolescence | negative | high | bias, narrowing of career definitions, and self-optimisation pressures from algorithmic career tools |
0.12
|
| In the platform economy, performance and career success are increasingly captured through alternative, often real-time metrics, diverging from traditional indicators and raising challenges for integrating conventional and non-traditional measures of career outcomes. Employment | mixed | high | measurement of performance and career success via real-time/platform metrics versus traditional indicators |
0.24
|
| STARA may widen inequalities across occupational groups and cohorts—particularly affecting low- and medium-skill occupations—by fragmenting or limiting career paths and reducing institutional supports. Inequality | negative | high | unequal career opportunities and widened inequalities across occupational groups |
0.24
|
| Overall, STARA technologies can both enhance skill development, thriving and career opportunities and concurrently produce identity threats, pressures, and contextual complexities that shape long-term career trajectories—requiring integrated organisational and labour-market perspectives to design supportive approaches. Skill Acquisition | mixed | high | net impact of STARA on career trajectories, including skill development and identity/psychological impacts |
0.12
|