The Commonplace
Home Papers Evidence Explore Trends Syntheses Digests References Docs 🎲 Workforce Futures
← Papers
Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review. How this is built →

GCC banks with stronger digital and AI capabilities gain market share, a panel study shows; the effect persists after accounting for profitability, bank size and macroeconomic conditions, suggesting technological adoption is a competitive advantage in the region.

Digitalisation and AI adoption as drivers of market share in GCC banking
Yousuf Albaker, Bashar Abu Khalaf · February 03, 2026 · Journal of Asian Scientific Research
openalex correlational medium evidence 7/10 relevance Full text usable extracted full text DOI Source PDF

Structured author observations

Linked only from stored provider relations; the raw author line above is never matched by name.

OpenAlex

Latest observation:

  1. Yousuf Albaker provider ID
  2. Bashar Abu Khalaf provider ID

Semantic Scholar

Latest observation:

  1. Yousef AlBaker provider ID
  2. Bashar Abu Khalaf provider ID
Panel analysis of 2015–2024 GCC bank data finds that higher levels of digitalization and AI adoption, as measured by constructed composite indices, are significantly associated with larger bank market share after controlling for profitability, size, and macro factors.

Citation observations

Cumulative provider counts captured on specific dates; providers are never combined.

This study investigates the impact of digitalization and AI adoption on the market share of banks operating in the Gulf Cooperation Council's (GCC) region, drawing upon the resource-based view (RBV) and dynamic capabilities theory (DCT). In the current context of digital transformation and AI-driven innovation reshaping the banking sector, it is crucial to understand the role of these technologies in driving competitive advantage. The study constructs novel composite indices for digitalization and AI adoption using secondary data from 400 bank-year observations across five GCC countries between 2015-2024. Employing a dynamic panel estimation technique, the analysis reveals that both digitalization and AI adoption significantly and positively influence bank market share, even after controlling for profitability, bank size, and macroeconomic conditions. These results hold strong across different models, supporting the idea that improving and adapting technological skills is key to enhancing the market share of banks. The study offers theoretical contributions by operationalizing digital and AI capabilities as strategic resources and practical implications for bank executives and policymakers aiming to strengthen digitalization in the financial sector. It also provides one of the first empirical validations of the digitalization–market share nexus in the GCC context, thereby filling an important gap in the literature on technology-enabled market performance.

Summary

Main Finding

Both bank-level digitalization and AI adoption significantly and positively increase banks’ market share in the GCC. These effects persist after controlling for profitability, market valuation, liquidity, bank size, and macroeconomic conditions, and are robust to dynamic panel estimation (System GMM) that addresses endogeneity and serial correlation.

Key Points

  • The paper frames technology adoption through the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT): digital and AI capabilities are strategic, hard-to-replicate resources that, when integrated dynamically, expand competitive advantage and market share.
  • Novel composite indices were constructed:
    • Digitalization Adoption Index (DAI): counts/weights items such as number of digital services (mobile app, internet banking), digital transaction volumes, and IT spending as % of operating costs.
    • AI Adoption Index (AIAI): captures AI-enabled features (chatbots, robo-advisors, automated credit scoring, fraud detection), investments in AI infrastructure and related keywords in annual reports.
  • Main hypotheses:
    • H1: Digitalization positively affects bank market share.
    • H2: AI adoption positively affects bank market share.
  • Results are consistent across multiple specifications, supporting the strategic importance of investing in digital and AI capabilities for market expansion in the GCC.

Data & Methods

  • Sample: 400 bank-year observations from 40 banks in five GCC countries (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman), 2015–2024. Bahrain excluded due to data gaps. Sample includes both conventional and Islamic banks.
  • Dependent variable:
    • Market Share (MS) = bank total assets / total assets of all banks in the same country.
  • Key independent variables:
    • Digitalization Adoption Index (DAI) — constructed from annual reports and activity measures (digital services, transaction volume, IT spending).
    • AI Adoption Index (AIAI) — constructed from annual reports and presence of AI applications/features.
  • Controls: Return on Assets (ROA), Market-to-Book ratio (MB), Loan-to-Deposit ratio (LDR), Bank Size (ln total assets), country GDP growth, and inflation.
  • Empirical strategy:
    • Dynamic panel models with lagged dependent variable.
    • Estimation via System GMM (Arellano–Bover / Blundell–Bond) to address endogeneity from the lagged dependent variable, possible simultaneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and serial correlation.
    • Robustness checks: Hansen J-test for instrument validity and Arellano–Bond tests for autocorrelation; alternative instrument sets and model variants reported.
  • Limitations noted by authors:
    • Bahrain omitted due to data; composite indices built from annual-report keyword-based measures may introduce measurement noise; some indices “are unscalable” (authors flag concerns about indexing approach and generalizability).

Implications for AI Economics

  • For theory:
    • Empirical support for treating digitalization and AI as strategic firm-level resources (RBV) that require dynamic reconfiguration (DCT) to convert into market power. Reinforces models linking technology investments to market structure outcomes, not only to efficiency or profitability.
  • For managers and banks:
    • Investment in digital platforms and AI capabilities can expand market share beyond short-term cost impacts. Executives should view AI/digitalization as long-term strategic assets—prioritize integration, talent, and processes to capture customer acquisition/retention gains.
    • Use composite measurement of adoption (beyond simple binary proxies) to better guide strategy and benchmark competitors.
  • For policymakers and regulators:
    • Encouraging digital and AI adoption (through infrastructure, skills, and regulatory clarity) can strengthen competitiveness of domestic banks. However, monitoring competition and concentration effects is important: technology-led scale advantages can increase market concentration.
    • Support for data infrastructure, cross-border digital payments, and AI governance frameworks will influence diffusion and competitive impacts across the banking sector.
  • For researchers in AI economics:
    • This study suggests profitable avenues: quantify the causal channels (customer acquisition vs. retention vs. product mix), heterogeneity across bank types (Islamic vs. conventional), and cross-country institutional moderators (regulation, digital infrastructure).
    • Future work should refine measurement of AI/digital adoption (e.g., machine-read indicators, transaction-level usage data), estimate effect magnitudes on market concentration and welfare, and explore labor, pricing, and risk implications of AI-driven market share shifts.

Assessment

Paper Typecorrelational Evidence Strengthmedium — The panel design and dynamic estimator strengthen inference relative to cross-sections by accounting for persistence and some time-varying confounders, and the authors report robustness across models; however, there is no clear exogenous source of variation (e.g., instrument, policy shock) to rule out reverse causality or remaining omitted variables, and AI/digitalization indices are constructed from secondary data which may contain measurement error. Methods Rigormedium — Appropriate and standard econometric tools for panel work are applied (dynamic panel models and multivariate controls) and the study reports robustness checks, but the paper appears to rely on composite index construction without detailed validation, lacks an exogenous identification strategy to strongly address endogeneity, and the description does not report tests (e.g., overidentification, weak instrument, or placebo checks) needed to elevate causal claims. Sample400 bank-year observations from banks operating in five GCC countries over 2015–2024; main explanatory variables are novel composite indices for digitalization and AI adoption built from secondary data, with controls for bank profitability, size, and macroeconomic conditions; sample likely mixes large and small commercial banks across the GCC. Themesadoption innovation org_design productivity IdentificationUses panel data (400 bank-year observations, 2015–2024) and a dynamic panel estimation strategy (lagged dependent variable and time-varying controls) to link newly constructed composite indices of digitalization and AI adoption to bank market share; controls include profitability, bank size, and macroeconomic conditions and results are checked across alternative model specifications (no exogenous instrument or natural experiment reported). GeneralizabilityGeographic limitation to GCC countries — regulatory, market structure and technology adoption patterns may differ elsewhere, Sector-specific (banking) — findings may not generalize to nonfinancial firms or other service/manufacturing sectors, Time window (2015–2024) captures specific stages of AI/digital diffusion; rapid technological change may alter effects outside this period, Measurement of digitalization/AI via composite indices may not map to actual AI capabilities or deployment intensity in other contexts, Potential heterogeneity by bank size/type and omitted institutional factors (e.g., national digital policies) limit broad external validity

Claims (8)

ClaimDirectionOutcomeConfidence & EvidenceDetails
Both digitalization and AI adoption significantly and positively influence bank market share. Market Structure positive bank market share
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
n=400
0.3
The positive effects of digitalization and AI adoption on market share hold after controlling for profitability, bank size, and macroeconomic conditions. Market Structure positive bank market share (conditional on controls)
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
n=400
0.3
The results are robust across different model specifications. Market Structure positive bank market share
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
n=400
0.3
The study constructs novel composite indices for digitalization and AI adoption using secondary data. Adoption Rate positive digitalization and AI adoption (measured via composite indices)
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
n=400
0.3
The analysis employs a dynamic panel estimation technique. Other positive bank market share (estimated via dynamic panel models)
Reading fidelity high
Study strength high
n=400
0.5
Operationalizing digital and AI capabilities as strategic resources offers theoretical contributions under the resource-based view (RBV) and dynamic capabilities theory (DCT). Other positive theoretical framing/operationalization of capabilities
Reading fidelity high
Study strength speculative
not reported
0.05
This study provides one of the first empirical validations of the digitalization–market share nexus in the GCC context. Market Structure positive bank market share
Reading fidelity medium
Study strength low
n=400
0.09
Improving and adapting technological skills is key to enhancing the market share of banks. Market Structure positive bank market share (as influenced by technological skills/capabilities)
Reading fidelity high
Study strength medium
n=400
0.3

Notes