Latin America is missing the foundational dataset and benchmark layers required to build representative AI, imposing industrial and sovereign costs; SURUS launches a task-first, open DataHub to index regional datasets and reward publication to close the gap.

Main Finding

Latin America lacks two foundational AI infrastructure layers — a datasets layer and a benchmarks layer — which together create both an industrial performance gap and a loss of sovereign capacity. The paper proposes a regionally focused, open, incentive-driven DataHub organized by a task-first ontology (//) to break a discovery–supply vicious cycle and jumpstart dataset creation, discovery, and reuse across the region.

Key Points

• Two missing layers:
  • Dataset layer: needed to train regionally-relevant models.
  • Benchmark layer: needed to evaluate local and imported models (LatamBoard is the companion effort).
• Dual-cost of absence:
  • Industry: universal tasks often require regionally peculiar data for state-of-the-art performance (performance gaps reduce adoption and productivity).
  • Public institutions / sovereignty: foreign-trained models embed external values, languages, narratives — affecting representation, governance, and inclusion.
• Two compounding problems for datasets:
  • Discovery: LA datasets are scattered (Hugging Face, appendices, etc.) with no regional index.
  • Supply: total volume of LA datasets is far below frontier needs; lack of visible returns disincentivizes publication.
• Solution design (DataHub):
  • Task-first ontology: organize by task → domain → language/variant (e.g., transcription / medical / Rioplatense Spanish).
  • Open by design and incentive-driven: openness to accelerate catch-up; mechanisms for contributor visibility, attribution, low-friction publishing.
  • Breaks the loop by indexing existing datasets (discovery) and making contribution rewarded and easy (supply).
• Remaining open problems: cross-jurisdictional legal heterogeneity (privacy, copyright), lack of shared metadata/licensing/quality standards, collaboration norms (attribution/versioning), and unclear incentives for companies/governments to publish internal datasets.
• Implementation status: SURUS built the first version of the DataHub (https://datahub.lat) as a kickstart and an invitation to regional actors.

Data & Methods

• Paper type: conceptual/position paper and design artifact (policy + infrastructure proposal), not an empirical experimental study.
• Methods used:
  • Literature synthesis across data governance, dataset practices, open-source economics, AI bias, and dataset metadata standards (survey of prior work and references).
  • Diagnostic mapping of the Latin American dataset landscape (qualitative): documents fragmentation, volume shortfall, and reinforcing feedback loop between discovery and supply.
  • System design/proposal: specification of a task-first ontology (//), normative argument for openness, and incentive mechanics (visibility/attribution/low-friction publishing).
  • Prototyping: development and publication of an initial DataHub instance to demonstrate feasibility and provide a live platform.
• Limitations of methods:
  • No quantitative estimates of dataset shortfall, economic cost, or model-performance gaps are provided in the paper.
  • Legal/regulatory, incentive, and standardization questions are identified but left as open policy and community-design items.

Implications for AI Economics

• Market failures and public-good dynamics:
  • Datasets and benchmarks are partial public goods with strong positive externalities and network effects; without coordination, underprovision and fragmentation persist.
  • The paper highlights a coordination failure: contributors lack visible returns, so supply remains low; discovery friction reduces reuse incentives — classic collective-action and commons-management problems.
• Path dependence and divergence:
  • The dataset accumulation gap compounds yearly; delay increases the region’s distance from frontier capabilities, raising switching and catch-up costs for firms and institutions.
• Productivity and adoption:
  • Industry-level productivity losses arise from models trained elsewhere underperforming on region-specific tasks (reduced adoption, procurement inefficiencies, and misallocation of investment).
  • Better local datasets and benchmarks reduce procurement risk, accelerate adoption of AI tools in productive sectors (health, agriculture, public administration), and improve realized returns on AI investment.
• Sovereignty and distributional outcomes:
  • Dependence on foreign datasets/models has distributional and governance consequences: misrepresentation, value-misalignment, and reduced local capacity to audit or regulate deployed systems.
  • Investing in dataset/benchmark infrastructure is an investment in digital sovereignty and policy leverage.
• Policy and institutional levers:
  • Policies that could unlock supply: grant/contract requirements to publish ML-ready datasets, university promotion criteria that value dataset curation, government open-data mandates with AI-ready formats, and industry incentives for data sharing (procurement preferences, tax incentives).
  • Standardization efforts (metadata, licensing, annotation schemas) reduce transaction costs and increase interoperability/value of datasets.
• Platform and incentive design:
  • A DataHub tailored to local needs with low-friction publishing, attribution, and visibility can create the positive feedback loop needed to grow the dataset commons.
  • Economically, this suggests investments in platform governance, contributor rewards, and reputation mechanisms yield large returns via network effects.
• Research agenda suggestions (for AI economists):
  • Quantify the economic cost of the dataset/benchmark gap (GDP impact, sectoral productivity losses).
  • Measure the relationship between dataset specificity (task/domain/language-variant) and model performance / adoption rates in key sectors.
  • Evaluate incentive mechanisms (reputation, funding mandates, procurement rules) for inducing private and public data contributors.
  • Model dynamic path-dependence of dataset accumulation and the effects of an intervention (e.g., a funded DataHub) on closing the capability gap.
• Strategic takeaway:
  • For non-frontier regions, an open, incentive-aligned, regionally governed dataset commons is an economically attractive strategy to accelerate capability-building, capture value from AI, and preserve policy agency — but it requires coordinated policy, standards, and platform governance to succeed.