An image-derived CLIP Q-score captures property 'luxury' and forecasts market value and liquidity: Moscow listings with higher CLIP Q-scores command higher prices and rent/sell faster, controlling for conventional property and location characteristics.

Main Finding

The authors introduce the CLIP Q-score, a reproducible, low-cost method to extract objective product-quality signals from images using CLIP. Applied to ~500k real-estate photos from a Moscow online platform (16k rental listings, 11k sales listings with images), the CLIP Q-score (P(positive prompt) − P(negative prompt)) correlates with human/multimodal-LLM assessments, aligns with known geographic and historical quality patterns, and is a strong, robust predictor of market outcomes: higher Q-scores are associated with higher listing prices (sales and rentals) and faster transactions (shorter time on market), especially for properties for sale.

Key Points

• CLIP Q-score definition and computation
  • For each image, compute CLIP image embedding and embeddings for three text prompts: positive (e.g., “This is a photo of a luxurious apartment.”), neutral, and negative (e.g., “This is a photo of a dilapidated apartment.”).
  • Compute similarities S(j)=e_img·e_text(j), scale by CLIP temperature τ to logits L(j), softmax to probabilities P(j); CLIP Q-score (polarity) = P(+) − P(−).
  • Implementation used openai/clip-vit-base-patch32 (ViT, 224×224 center crop preprocessor).
• Validation and descriptive evidence
  • CLIP Q-scores strongly positively correlate with scores from a multimodal LLM.
  • Scores correlate with users’ self-reported “state of repair”, follow an interpretable U-shaped pattern by year of construction, map sensibly across Moscow neighborhoods, and are lower for properties flagged for demolition.
• Predictive power for market outcomes
  • CLIP Q-score is among the most predictive features in hedonic regressions of price, retaining significance after controlling for standard structural, geographic, and building covariates.
  • Higher Q-scores predict shorter time-on-market (improved liquidity), with stronger effects for sale listings than rentals.
• Reproducibility, efficiency, and safety advantages
  • CLIP-based scoring is fully reproducible (same model + prompts → same scores), computationally cheap, can run locally (avoids cloud provider inference), and does not require sharing raw images with external inference services.
• Photo-quality confounding addressed
  • Image technical metrics (sharpness via Laplacian variance, BRISQUE, brightness, resolution, aspect ratio) have statistically significant but very small associations with CLIP polarity; an OLS explaining CLIP polarity by these features yields R^2 ≈ 0.025–0.03. Authors therefore use an adjusted CLIP score (property-level average residuals) to remove technical-image effects.

Data & Methods

• Data
  • Source: cian.ru (Moscow), crawled posts for long-term rent and secondary sales from 2025-07-01 to 2025-08-14; followed until 2025-12-05 for price history and time-on-market.
  • Images: 275,477 rental images; 216,271 sale images (~491k total). Listings with images: 16,047 rentals; 11,129 sales.
  • Listing metadata: area, rooms, bathrooms, ceiling height, floor, building year/material, demolition-program flag, distances to center/metro/green/industrial zones, reported “state of repair”.
• CLIP Q-score method
  • Model: openai/clip-vit-base-patch32 from HuggingFace.
  • Prompts: one positive, one neutral, one negative quality-describing sentence (adaptable to other products).
  • Score per image: polarity = P(+) − P(−) from CLIP softmax over the three prompts.
  • Aggregation: adjust polarity for image-quality confounders by regressing CLIP polarity on image technical metrics (resolution, aspect ratio, sharpness, BRISQUE, brightness) and using average residuals per property as the property-level Q-score.
• Validation & analysis
  • Correlation with multimodal LLM quality assessments.
  • Descriptive checks: correlation with self-reported repair state, spatial patterns, building-age patterns, demolition flag.
  • Predictive tests: hedonic price regressions and time-on-market regressions controlling for standard covariates; CLIP Q-score included as an explanatory variable.
• Implementation notes
  • Images preprocessed by CLIP’s standard pipeline: resize and center 224×224 crop (aspect-ratio differences may drop periphery).
  • Method is prompt-dependent (authors used three-level polarity prompts) but simple and modular — more fine-grained descriptors could be added.

Implications for AI Economics

• Practical tool for scalably measuring product quality
  • Enables objective, reproducible quality measurement from images across large datasets at low compute cost; useful for hedonic pricing, valuation models, market microstructure, and platform economics.
• Enhances multimodal economic analysis
  • Opens door to integrating standardized image-derived quality measures into demand/supply models, automated valuation models, return-rate prediction, and liquidity analyses.
• Research design and replication benefits
  • Because CLIP implementations and prompts are deterministic (given model/version), results are replicable across researchers, improving credibility of image-based economic findings.
• Policy and platform applications
  • Platforms could use CLIP Q-scores for quality indexing, search ranking, fraud or misrepresentation detection, or to design incentives for better listings (e.g., subsidized photo services).
• Cautions and limitations to consider
  • Prompt and model choice: scores depend on prompt wording and CLIP variant; cross-model or cross-lingual portability needs testing.
  • Selection and photography effects: agents/owners choose which photos to upload and may stage properties; CLIP measures “how property is presented” in images, which may diverge from intrinsic quality.
  • Distributional and fairness risks: model pretraining data biases could cause systematic misestimation across regions, styles, or housing types; requires careful validation before causal interpretation.
  • Temporal drift and model updates: as CLIP or related encoders evolve, score calibrations may change — versioning is essential for longitudinal studies.
• Research opportunities
  • Extend CLIP Q-score to other product categories (used goods, fashion, cars, electronics).
  • Combine with text/transaction data to decompose photography quality vs intrinsic item quality.
  • Use in causal designs: instrument for visual quality, examine search/listing algorithms, or test interventions (e.g., professional photography subsidies).

Short summary: The CLIP Q-score is a simple, reproducible, and low-cost method to extract image-based product-quality signals. In a large real-estate application it aligns with human assessments and meaningfully predicts prices and liquidity, offering a practical tool for AI-enabled economic analyses while also requiring careful attention to prompt design, selection effects, and potential biases.