AI-written novels are flooding Amazon: substantial-AI self-published books form a large and growing share of titles and are increasingly taking top sales ranks, though on average they earn less per book than non‑AI works.

Main Finding

Generative-AI–written books have flooded self-published genre fiction on Amazon and diluted market returns: AI-heavy titles (>25% detected AI text) now make up a large and growing share of releases and some top-rank slots, but they capture disproportionately less sales and revenue per title. The catalog expanded much faster than the revenue pool, reducing revenue per selling book across most genres and shifting attention/Top-25 positions toward AI-produced works — a market effect consistent with “dilution” rather than only low-quality irrelevance.

Key Points

• Dataset and scope

  • 14,419 randomly sampled self-published genre-fiction e‑books released Jan 2023–Mar 2026; daily sales observed through June 2026.
  • Full-text AI detection performed on each book; titles grouped as: no AI (0%), light AI (>0–25%), substantial AI (>25%).
  • Sales/revenue/price/rank panel from a major publisher covering ~500k ASINs (≈95%+ of eBook daily unit volume).

• Market composition and shares

  • Books with substantial AI text = 20.0% of sampled titles but only 12.1% of sales and 11.3% of revenue.
  • Books with no AI text = 62.9% of titles but 71.7% of sales and 72.5% of revenue.
  • Light-AI books account for ~17% of titles and ~16% of sales/revenue.

• Growth and dilution dynamics

  • From 2023 Q1 to 2026 Q1: cumulative released catalog grew 38.3×; books selling in a quarter grew 19.2×; quarterly unit sales grew 7.3×; quarterly revenue grew 8.9×.
  • Catalog/release growth far outpaced revenue growth → revenue per selling book declined across most genres and cohorts.
  • Launch-window revenue per selling book fell from 2023 → 2025 cohorts for most groups; drop is not just a compositional effect (it also affects no-AI books).

• Top-rank and turnover effects

  • Share of observed sales held by substantial-AI books rose from near 0 (early 2023) to ~20% by 2026 Q2.
  • Substantial-AI share among newly entering Top-25 slots rose to ~31% of new entrants at peak; Top-25 retention for no-AI books fell sharply before partial recovery.
  • Thus some AI-heavy books reach scarce top positions, increasing turnover.

• Heterogeneity: genres and Kindle Unlimited (KU)

  • Declines in returns for no-AI books are concentrated where AI exposure is highest.
  • Effects are larger in genres with greater Kindle Unlimited availability (shared borrow pool intensifies competition).

• Producer behavior and concentration

  • Many adopters scaled output after first substantial-AI release: of 385 byline identities that released additional substantial-AI books, 287 increased monthly output.
  • Output expansion is broad-based but skewed: top quartile of adopters produced ~60.5% of post-adoption output (Gini ≈ 0.48).
  • Some producers reached real commercial scale: top identity generated $1.7M gross consumer revenue across 8 titles; single top AI-heavy book grossed $643K (80,431 units).
  • Note: byline splitting (pen names) likely understates concentration; revenue measures are gross consumer spending (platform cuts/royalties lower).

• Textual signature of successful AI books

  • Successful substantial-AI books show high overlap with “rare” expressions from existing books: defined as phrases appearing in ≤5 Google Books volumes and absent from a 4.7‑trillion-token web snapshot.
  • Among top sellers, AI-heavy successful books are disproportionately saturated with such distinctive rare language, consistent with models that reproduce or remix rare in‑corpus language from training data.

• Robustness & caveats noted by authors

  • Main results robust to varying the 25% AI threshold.
  • Observational design: causal inference limited; detection accuracy and dataset representativeness (self-published genre fiction on Amazon) are constraints.

Data & Methods

• Sample acquisition: lawful full texts obtained via author-supplied epubs, library loans (Libby/Hoopla), or Amazon purchases.
• Sales panel: proprietary daily sales panel from a major Big-Five publisher, tracking ~500k ASINs and estimated to cover ≈95%+ of eBook daily unit volume.
• AI detection: full-text AI detection applied to each title; classification bands: 0% (no AI), >0–25% (light), >25% (substantial). (Authors test robustness to cutoff.)
• Observation window: launch window = pre-order period + first 90 days after release; used for standardized cohort comparisons.
• Top-rank construction: per genre-week, sampled titles ranked by median Amazon sales rank; top 25 sampled titles per genre-week retained and aggregated to quarters to study top-rank composition and turnover.
• Distinctive-language metric: measured coverage of “rare expressions” (≤5 Google Books volumes & absent from a 4.7T-token web snapshot) to capture overlap with specific-book language rather than common web phrases.
• Aggregation and cohort analyses: cohort comparisons (2023–2025 releases), genre-cluster analysis (8 clusters), KU availability interactions, and author-level event-time output comparisons.

Implications for AI Economics

• Market mechanism: generative AI reshapes creative markets primarily via scale and supply-side expansion, not only via blanket low quality. Cheap, high-volume production can dilute per-title returns and reallocate scarce attention/top-rank positions even if average AI output sells worse than human-written books.
• Welfare & distributional effects: readers gain a larger catalog and potentially lower prices, but average earnings per title (especially for independent self-publishers) fall; gains concentrate among high-volume adopters and a subset of AI-produced bestsellers, while many titles sell little.
• Platform design and business models: subscription/borrow models (e.g., Kindle Unlimited) exacerbate dilution because each new AI title competes for the same borrow pool; platform curation, discovery, and ranking policies will shape who benefits.
• Policy and legal relevance: empirical evidence of market dilution bears directly on the “market effect” component of copyright fair-use debates over AI training/data use — courts evaluating harm to potential markets can draw on these market-level dilution effects as a plausible mechanism by which large-scale AI production displaces incumbent works.
• Detection, disclosure, and regulation: findings support arguments for transparent AI-disclosure policies, stronger provenance/detection tools, and possibly platform-level interventions (labeling, guardrails, changes to recommendation/ranking) to address negative externalities on creators.
• Research and measurement priorities: need for improved, transparent, and validated full-text AI-detection methods, causal studies (e.g., natural experiments or platform policy changes) to pin down impact magnitudes, and broader market studies beyond self-published genre fiction to assess generality.

Limitations to bear in mind - Observational sample limited to self-published genre fiction on Amazon; results may not generalize to trade publishing, non-genre categories, or different platforms. - AI-detection errors and threshold choice can affect classification (though authors test robustness). - Revenue reported is gross consumer spending before platform fees and author royalties. - Byline fragmentation (pen names) likely understates producer concentration.

Bottom line: generative-AI output can measurably dilute a creative market through massive supply growth and contestation of top positions — a mechanism with direct economic and legal consequences for authors, platforms, and policymakers.