10 cumulative citations
View corpus contextAI browser agents are primarily used by wealthier, better-educated and knowledge-sector users and mostly for productivity and learning tasks. Personal queries make up over half of interactions, but usage becomes more cognitively oriented over time, with the top 10 tasks accounting for more than half of activity.
The Adoption and Usage of AI Agents: Early Evidence from Perplexity
Using hundreds of millions of anonymized Comet interactions, the paper documents that adoption and intensive use of an open-world AI agent are concentrated among earlier adopters, higher-GDP/education countries and knowledge-intensive occupations, with Productivity & Workflow and Learning & Research dominating queries and a shift over time toward more cognitive uses.
Citation observations
Cumulative provider counts captured on specific dates; providers are never combined.
This paper presents the first large-scale field study of the adoption, usage intensity, and use cases of general-purpose AI agents operating in open-world web environments. Our analysis centers on Comet, an AI-powered browser developed by Perplexity, and its integrated agent, Comet Assistant. Drawing on hundreds of millions of anonymized user interactions, we address three fundamental questions: Who is using AI agents? How intensively are they using them? And what are they using them for? Our findings reveal substantial heterogeneity in adoption and usage across user segments. Earlier adopters, users in countries with higher GDP per capita and educational attainment, and individuals working in digital or knowledge-intensive sectors -- such as digital technology, academia, finance, marketing, and entrepreneurship -- are more likely to adopt or actively use the agent. To systematically characterize the substance of agent usage, we introduce a hierarchical agentic taxonomy that organizes use cases across three levels: topic, subtopic, and task. The two largest topics, Productivity & Workflow and Learning & Research, account for 57% of all agentic queries, while the two largest subtopics, Courses and Shopping for Goods, make up 22%. The top 10 out of 90 tasks represent 55% of queries. Personal use constitutes 55% of queries, while professional and educational contexts comprise 30% and 16%, respectively. In the short term, use cases exhibit strong stickiness, but over time users tend to shift toward more cognitively oriented topics. The diffusion of increasingly capable AI agents carries important implications for researchers, businesses, policymakers, and educators, inviting new lines of inquiry into this rapidly emerging class of AI capabilities.
Summary
Main Finding
Early, large-scale field evidence from Perplexity’s Comet browser shows that general-purpose AI agents are already being adopted unevenly across countries, cohorts, and occupations, and are used predominantly for productivity and learning tasks. Usage intensity grew rapidly after general availability; earlier adopters and users in higher-GDP, higher-education, and knowledge-intensive occupations both adopt more and use agents far more intensively. Agentic queries concentrate in a relatively small set of tasks and environments, are sticky in the short run, and shift over time toward more cognitively oriented topics (productivity, learning, career).
Key Points
-
Adoption and intensity
- Comet launch window studied: July 9–Oct 22, 2025 (data cutoff before a major agent update).
- Post-GA (after Oct 2) accounts for ~60% of adopters and ~50% of agentic queries in the window.
- Earlier adopters (pre-GA) are disproportionately heavy users: ~2× more likely to adopt and ~9× more agentic queries per user than GA cohort.
- Country-level adoption and intensity positively correlate with GDP per capita and average years of education.
- Occupational concentration: digital technology (28% of adopters; 30% of queries) is largest; academia, finance, marketing, entrepreneurship also overrepresented. These clusters together account for >70% of adopters and queries.
-
Taxonomy and use cases
- Authors introduce a hierarchical agentic taxonomy: Topic → Subtopic → Task (90 tasks across topics).
- Topic shares: Productivity & Workflow 36%, Learning & Research 21%, Media & Entertainment 16%, Shopping & Commerce 10% (Productivity + Learning = 57%).
- Major subtopics (>5% each): Courses (13%), Goods shopping (9%), Research (8%), Document editing (8%), Account management (7%), Social media (7%).
- Top tasks: exercise assistance (9%), research summarization & analysis (7%), document creation/editing (7%), product search/filter (6%), research search/filter (6%).
- Top 10 tasks (out of 90) account for 55% of queries.
- Contexts: 55% personal, 30% professional, 16% educational.
- Environments (websites/apps) concentration varies by subtopic — e.g., music and video tasks are highly concentrated (>95% in top 5 environments), whereas account management and service shopping are more distributed.
-
Dynamics
- Short-term stickiness within topics is strong; when users transition topics they tend toward productivity, learning, or media.
- Over the sample window, shares moved from travel/media into productivity/learning/career topics.
Data & Methods
-
Data sources and period
- Three samples from Comet desktop users between July 9 and Oct 22, 2025:
- Population-level anonymized logs: millions of users, hundreds of millions of queries for aggregate adoption/usage statistics.
- Random sample of 100,000 Comet users: occupation classification via O*NET / National Career Clusters Framework to study occupational heterogeneity.
- Random sample of 100,000 agent users: manual (or coded) classification of all agentic queries into the hierarchical taxonomy to characterize use cases.
-
Definition of “agentic query”
- Stricter than mere tool usage: a query in which the agent takes control of the browser or acts on external apps through browser control, Model Context Protocol (MCP) connectors, or API calls — i.e., the agent manipulates the external environment rather than only exchanging information.
- Exclusions: onboarding demo queries, enterprise/government accounts, users who deleted accounts/opted out, multi-call queries were excluded in rare cases.
-
Agent definition and framing
- Agentic AI defined as goal-oriented systems that plan and take multi-step actions in environments (ReAct framework: think → act → observe).
- Comet Assistant is a general-purpose open-world agent embedded in the browser able to schedule, edit, send, book, purchase, etc.
-
Privacy & limitations of methods
- Data anonymized; enterprise/government users excluded.
- Time window ends before a major agent upgrade (rolled out after Oct 22), so findings are early-adoption patterns and may change with newer capabilities.
- Classification/taxonomy is subject to labeling error and depends on the authors’ taxonomy choices; multi-environment/multi-task complexities were simplified in labels.
Implications for AI Economics
-
Distributional and labor-market effects
- Early adopters concentrated in higher-GDP, higher-education regions and knowledge-intensive occupations implies initial productivity gains will be unevenly distributed, potentially widening within- and across-country inequality in the short run.
- Occupation- and task-level concentration suggests differential exposure: digital/knowledge workers may receive early complementarities, while other occupations may face delayed impacts or different task reallocation needs.
-
Firm strategy and market structure
- Firms in digital, research, education, finance, marketing, and entrepreneurship sectors are likely to capture early value from agent integration; platforms enabling agent-environment connectors (APIs, MCP) will become strategic assets.
- High concentration of activity in a small set of tasks/environments suggests network effects and winner-take-most dynamics for specialized integrations (e.g., agents optimized for travel bookings vs. multimedia).
-
Measurement and research agenda
- Economists should measure agentic actions (not just conversational queries) to study productivity, task reallocation, and complementarities with human capital.
- Key causal questions: do agentic interactions raise individual or firm-level productivity, change labor demand across occupations, alter wage structures, or affect consumer surplus and market competition?
- Need for longitudinal studies beyond early-adoption windows and across upgraded agent capabilities (multi-tab/multi-agent orchestration).
-
Policy and education
- Policymakers may need targeted policies: retraining/upskilling for displaced tasks, support for equitable access (connectivity, education), and regulatory approaches for privacy, safety, and agent-mediated transactions.
- Educators should anticipate integration of agents into curricula and assessment, given strong usage for courses and exercise assistance.
-
Privacy, safety, and governance
- Agents manipulate user environments and make transactions, raising novel regulatory concerns (authorization, liability, fraud risk, data leakage) beyond those for conversational LLMs.
- Early concentration in personal and professional use underscores the need for standards around consent, auditability, and verifiability of agent actions.
Limitations to bear in mind: findings reflect one product (Comet) during an early rollout; agent capabilities and adoption patterns may evolve rapidly with product/architecture upgrades and wider diffusion.
Assessment
Paper Typedescriptive
Evidence Strengthlow — The paper provides a large-scale, high-granularity description of usage patterns but does not identify causal effects; findings are observational and subject to selection and measurement biases tied to platform users.
Methods Rigormedium — Analysis leverages hundreds of millions of anonymized interactions and a systematic hierarchical taxonomy of agent use, showing careful descriptive work; however, results rely on a single platform, lack user-level outcome measures, and face potential biases from anonymization, bots, and self-selection.
SampleHundreds of millions of anonymized user interactions with Comet, an AI-powered browser/agent developed by Perplexity; users span multiple countries and occupations but are platform users (earlier adopters over-represented), with interactions classified into a three-level taxonomy of topics, subtopics and tasks; exact timeframe and sampling window not specified in the summary.
Themesadoption productivity human_ai_collab
GeneralizabilityLimited to Comet/Perplexity users and their behavior, not representative of the general population, Selection bias toward earlier adopters, higher-GDP and higher-education users, Unknown geographic coverage and potential under-representation of low-income countries, Anonymized interaction logs may miss contextual information (intent, outcomes, demographics), No direct linkage to economic outcomes (productivity, wages, employment) or long-term impacts, Possible contamination from bots, shared devices, or multi-user accounts
Claims (14)
| Claim | Direction | Outcome | Confidence & Evidence | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This paper presents the first large-scale field study of the adoption, usage intensity, and use cases of general-purpose AI agents operating in open-world web environments. Other | positive | existence/novelty of the study |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
speculative
|
not reported
|
| The analysis draws on hundreds of millions of anonymized user interactions. Other | positive | dataset size (number of interactions) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
hundreds of millions
|
| There is substantial heterogeneity in adoption and usage across user segments. Adoption Rate | mixed | heterogeneity in adoption and usage |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Users in countries with higher GDP per capita are more likely to adopt or actively use the agent. Adoption Rate | positive | likelihood of adoption / active use |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Users in countries with higher educational attainment are more likely to adopt or actively use the agent. Adoption Rate | positive | likelihood of adoption / active use |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Individuals working in digital or knowledge-intensive sectors (digital technology, academia, finance, marketing, entrepreneurship) are more likely to adopt or actively use the agent. Adoption Rate | positive | likelihood of adoption / active use |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| Earlier adopters are more likely to be active users of the agent. Adoption Rate | positive | user activity level conditional on adoption cohort |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The authors introduce a hierarchical agentic taxonomy that organizes use cases across three levels: topic, subtopic, and task. Task Allocation | positive | structure of use-case classification |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The two largest topics, Productivity & Workflow and Learning & Research, account for 57% of all agentic queries. Task Allocation | positive | share of agentic queries by topic |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
57% of all agentic queries
|
| The two largest subtopics, Courses and Shopping for Goods, make up 22% of agentic queries. Task Allocation | positive | share of agentic queries by subtopic |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
22% of queries
|
| The top 10 out of 90 tasks represent 55% of queries. Task Allocation | positive | concentration of queries among top tasks |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
55% of queries
|
| Personal use constitutes 55% of queries, professional contexts comprise 30%, and educational contexts comprise 16%. Task Allocation | positive | share of queries by context (personal/professional/educational) |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
personal 55%; professional 30%; educational 16%
|
| In the short term, use cases exhibit strong stickiness, but over time users tend to shift toward more cognitively oriented topics. Task Allocation | mixed | temporal persistence and shift in use-case composition |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
medium
|
not reported
|
| The diffusion of increasingly capable AI agents carries important implications for researchers, businesses, policymakers, and educators, inviting new lines of inquiry into this rapidly emerging class of AI capabilities. Governance And Regulation | positive | implications for stakeholders / research agenda |
Reading fidelity
high
Study strength
speculative
|
not reported
|