Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
1Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
No provider ID is stored.
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Jocelyn Kang (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A deployment-grounded benchmark shows Knowtex’s clinical models had 97.99% of generated documentation tokens accepted into signed notes across over one million encounters and 13 specialties, but key companion statistics (notably completeness and signed-note rates) are withheld, limiting interpretation of the figure as true clinician effort reduction.arxiv | Jocelyn Kang unresolved |
2026-09-14 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.