Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
4Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2264257819
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Max J. van Duijn (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Output Quality: 1 paper
- Worker Satisfaction: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retrieval-augmented chat assistants boost human task accuracy across small and large LLMs; but users don't rate larger models as more usable or satisfying, revealing a gap between technical performance gains and user perception.arxiv | Max J. van Duijn provider id |
2026-05-01 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.