Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
4Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2370523853
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Sooyohn Nam (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Innovation: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Creativity: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Designers testing a multi-agent creative tool quickly abandon full agent autonomy and instead orchestrate multiple AIs themselves, suggesting humans prefer hands-on control when coordinating several AI roles.arxiv | Sooyohn Nam provider id |
2026-01-20 | 3 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 3 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.