Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
0Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2025. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
1922834670
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- M. Thompson (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Error Rate: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combining deterministic post-condition checks with retries and informed backtracking cuts LLM code-generation failures by up to 66 percentage points at modest extra cost, but recovery mechanics alone cannot yet substitute for plan synthesis—autonomous software engineering remains out of reach.arxiv | M. Thompson provider id |
2025-12-18 | 2 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 2 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.