Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
2Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2357977932
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Sid Black (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Team Performance: 1 paper
- Other: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLMs often refuse to help even when helping costs nothing: in a frictionless coordination task OpenAI o3 achieved only 17% of optimal collective performance while o3-mini reached 50%. Simple fixes—explicit communication protocols and tiny sharing incentives—substantially raise cooperation, implying that smarter models alone will not solve coordination failures.arxiv | Sid Black provider id |
2026-04-09 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 1 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.