Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
3Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2373715749
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Emma Söderberg (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Output Quality: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human-friendly code survives AI edits better: a study of 5,000 Python competitive-programming files finds higher CodeHealth predicts stronger semantic preservation after LLM refactoring, implying maintainability lowers AI intervention risk and can guide where human oversight is most needed.arxiv | Emma Söderberg provider id |
2026-01-05 | 4 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 4 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.