Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
1Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
122684215
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Samil Oh (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Firm Productivity: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Task Completion Time: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI is widely adopted by Korean workers and cuts reported working time by nearly 4%, yet measured output remains unchanged. Workers largely use the time saved for on-the-job leisure, suggesting standard productivity statistics may miss GenAI's welfare effects.arxiv | Samil Oh provider id |
2026-02-13 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.