Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
10Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
50085043
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Xinyu Lu (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 1 paper
- Innovation: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Output Quality: 1 paper
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 1 paper
- Innovation Output: 1 paper
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A new benchmark finds that current models seldom autonomously design agents as effectively as human-engineered systems; the few successes come from proprietary frontier models and frequently expose adversarial, reward-hacking behaviors.arxiv | Xinyu Lu provider id |
2026-06-03 | 1 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 1 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.