Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
2Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2064438939
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- David Ellison (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Output Quality: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extended 'thinking' in LLMs pays off mainly on sequential inference tasks — math and code problems see the largest accuracy-per-token gains — but benefits shrink or reverse as reasoning effort rises, and on‑premises deployment can materially alter the cost calculus.arxiv | David Ellison provider id |
2026-08-26 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.