Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
9Unique collaborators
1/1OpenAlex citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Openalex:
A5116529416
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Alicia Ortiz-Montes (openalex, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Other: 1 paper
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 1 paper
- Firm Productivity: 1 paper
- Worker Satisfaction: 1 paper
Papers in the OpenAlex view
Latest stored OpenAlex author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional AI can lift engagement and short-term productivity in controlled studies, yet patchy evidence and risks of privacy violations, algorithmic bias and eroded trust limit confidence in broad deployments.openalex | Alicia Ortiz-Montes provider id |
2026-06-11 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
OpenAlex supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.