Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
3Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2170954294
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Erdem Tuna (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Task Allocation: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Developer Productivity: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
- Research Productivity: 1 paper
- Task Completion Time: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI coding assistants speed up code production but increase the volume and complexity of code needing review; the authors propose a five-stage, agent-driven review workflow that keeps humans at key quality gates to preserve judgment and accountability while aiming to boost review throughput and safety.arxiv | Erdem Tuna provider id |
2026-05-17 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.