Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
0Unique collaborators
1/1OpenAlex citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Openalex:
A5134482311
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (2)
- Andrew J. Peterson (openalex, provider refresh)
- Peterson, Andrew J. (openalex, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Governance: 1 paper
- Human Ai Collab: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
- Adoption Rate: 1 paper
- Regulatory Compliance: 1 paper
Papers in the OpenAlex view
Latest stored OpenAlex author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Making AI reviewable and usable in government can backfire: codified procedures improve oversight on paper but create a playbook for successors to legally entrench politicized decisions, increasing strategic exploitation and locking in automation expansions.openalex | Peterson, Andrew J. provider id |
2026-04-22 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
OpenAlex supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.