Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
2Distinct papers
2Unique collaborators
2/2Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2449955209
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Maher Kallel (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 2 papers
- Human Ai Collab: 2 papers
- Adoption: 1 paper
- Labor Markets: 1 paper
- Productivity: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Research Productivity: 2 papers
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 2 papers
- Organizational Efficiency: 1 paper
- Other: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
- Skill Obsolescence: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap, abundant machine-checked proofs do not make mathematical knowledge easier to adjudicate; they concentrate difficulty on a tiny pool of experts who must decide whether formal statements actually mean what the informal questions do, widening the gap between certified and socially accepted results.arxiv | Maher Kallel provider id |
2026-08-29 | 0 |
| Agentic AI could hollow out the shared pool of human knowledge, but the catastrophe is not inevitable; instead, the model flags a credible negative externality — a 'tragedy of the cognitive commons' — that requires measurement of human effort responses and better aggregation institutions.openalex | Maher Kallel provider id |
2026-07-14 | 0 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 2 of 2 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 0 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.