Direction, evidence grade, and study type are AI-generated labels (gpt-5-mini), not human-verified. Syntheses are LLM-written. "Tensions" are machine-detected candidates, not confirmed contradictions. A research-acceleration tool, not peer review.
How this is built →
1Distinct papers
4Unique collaborators
1/1Semantic Scholar citation coverage
Publication span: 2026. Corpus fetch span: 2026.
Identity provenance
Provider IDs
- Semantic Scholar:
2323789230
ORCID evidence
No valid ORCID is stored.
Observed aliases (1)
- Sina Mavali (semantic scholar, provider refresh)
Topics and outcomes in this view
Assessment themes
- Governance: 1 paper
- Org Design: 1 paper
Claim outcomes
- Ai Safety And Ethics: 1 paper
- Governance And Regulation: 1 paper
Papers in the Semantic Scholar view
Latest stored Semantic Scholar author observations only. Citation counts below are from the same provider and are not combined with other services.
Scroll the table horizontally to see every column.
| Paper | Author evidence | Date | Provider citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| A single compromised LLM can hijack group decisions in multi-agent systems via a persuasion cascade; dynamically reducing trust in suspected adversaries (while tuning agent stubbornness and scale) curbs influence at the cost of some coordination or compute overhead.arxiv | Sina Mavali provider id |
2026-03-16 | 2 |
Citation observation summary
Semantic Scholar supplied counts for 1 of 1 papers in this view; 0 are missing. The observed paper counts sum to 2 cumulative citations. This is a coverage summary, not an author score or h-index.